16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial : Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. / Thrane, Pernille G.; Kristensen, Steen D.; Olesen, Kevin K.W.; Mortense, Leif S.; Bøtker, Hans Erik; Thuesen, Leif; Hansen, Henrik S.; Abildgaard, Ulrik; Engstrøm, Thomas; Andersen, Henning R.; Maeng, Michael.

I: European Heart Journal, Bind 41, Nr. 7, 2020, s. 847-854.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Thrane, PG, Kristensen, SD, Olesen, KKW, Mortense, LS, Bøtker, HE, Thuesen, L, Hansen, HS, Abildgaard, U, Engstrøm, T, Andersen, HR & Maeng, M 2020, '16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction', European Heart Journal, bind 41, nr. 7, s. 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595

APA

Thrane, P. G., Kristensen, S. D., Olesen, K. K. W., Mortense, L. S., Bøtker, H. E., Thuesen, L., Hansen, H. S., Abildgaard, U., Engstrøm, T., Andersen, H. R., & Maeng, M. (2020). 16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. European Heart Journal, 41(7), 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595

Vancouver

Thrane PG, Kristensen SD, Olesen KKW, Mortense LS, Bøtker HE, Thuesen L o.a. 16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. European Heart Journal. 2020;41(7):847-854. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595

Author

Thrane, Pernille G. ; Kristensen, Steen D. ; Olesen, Kevin K.W. ; Mortense, Leif S. ; Bøtker, Hans Erik ; Thuesen, Leif ; Hansen, Henrik S. ; Abildgaard, Ulrik ; Engstrøm, Thomas ; Andersen, Henning R. ; Maeng, Michael. / 16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial : Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction. I: European Heart Journal. 2020 ; Bind 41, Nr. 7. s. 847-854.

Bibtex

@article{87cc3e30d74a4818b3e485a65265bd74,
title = "16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction",
abstract = "Aims The DANish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial found that interhospital transport to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) was superior to fibrinolysis at the local hospital in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at 30 days. The present study investigates the 16-year cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results We randomized 1572 STEMI patients to pPCI or fibrinolysis at 24 referral hospitals and 5 invasive centres in Denmark. Patients randomized to pPCI at referral hospitals were immediately transported to the nearest invasive centre. The main endpoint of the current study was a composite of death or rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI). Outcome information beyond 3 years was obtained through Danish health registries. After 16 years, pPCI-treated patients had a sustained lower rate of composite endpoint compared to patients treated with fibrinolysis in the overall cohort [58.7% vs. 62.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.98], and among patients transported for pPCI (58.7% vs. 64.1%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96). No difference in all-cause mortality was found, but cardiac mortality was reduced by an absolute of 4.4% in favour of pPCI (18.3% vs. 22.7%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.98). pPCI postponed a main event with 12.3 months in average compared to fibrinolysis (95% CI 5.0-19.5). Conclusion The benefit of pPCI over fibrinolysis was maintained at 16-year follow-up. pPCI reduced the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization for MI, reduced cardiac mortality, and delayed average time to a main event by approximately 1 year.",
keywords = "Fibrinolysis, Long-term outcome, Percutaneous coronary intervention, ST-elevation myocardial infarction",
author = "Thrane, {Pernille G.} and Kristensen, {Steen D.} and Olesen, {Kevin K.W.} and Mortense, {Leif S.} and B{\o}tker, {Hans Erik} and Leif Thuesen and Hansen, {Henrik S.} and Ulrik Abildgaard and Thomas Engstr{\o}m and Andersen, {Henning R.} and Michael Maeng",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "847--854",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial

T2 - Primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevationmyocardial infarction

AU - Thrane, Pernille G.

AU - Kristensen, Steen D.

AU - Olesen, Kevin K.W.

AU - Mortense, Leif S.

AU - Bøtker, Hans Erik

AU - Thuesen, Leif

AU - Hansen, Henrik S.

AU - Abildgaard, Ulrik

AU - Engstrøm, Thomas

AU - Andersen, Henning R.

AU - Maeng, Michael

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Aims The DANish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial found that interhospital transport to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) was superior to fibrinolysis at the local hospital in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at 30 days. The present study investigates the 16-year cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results We randomized 1572 STEMI patients to pPCI or fibrinolysis at 24 referral hospitals and 5 invasive centres in Denmark. Patients randomized to pPCI at referral hospitals were immediately transported to the nearest invasive centre. The main endpoint of the current study was a composite of death or rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI). Outcome information beyond 3 years was obtained through Danish health registries. After 16 years, pPCI-treated patients had a sustained lower rate of composite endpoint compared to patients treated with fibrinolysis in the overall cohort [58.7% vs. 62.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.98], and among patients transported for pPCI (58.7% vs. 64.1%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96). No difference in all-cause mortality was found, but cardiac mortality was reduced by an absolute of 4.4% in favour of pPCI (18.3% vs. 22.7%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.98). pPCI postponed a main event with 12.3 months in average compared to fibrinolysis (95% CI 5.0-19.5). Conclusion The benefit of pPCI over fibrinolysis was maintained at 16-year follow-up. pPCI reduced the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization for MI, reduced cardiac mortality, and delayed average time to a main event by approximately 1 year.

AB - Aims The DANish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial found that interhospital transport to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) was superior to fibrinolysis at the local hospital in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at 30 days. The present study investigates the 16-year cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results We randomized 1572 STEMI patients to pPCI or fibrinolysis at 24 referral hospitals and 5 invasive centres in Denmark. Patients randomized to pPCI at referral hospitals were immediately transported to the nearest invasive centre. The main endpoint of the current study was a composite of death or rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI). Outcome information beyond 3 years was obtained through Danish health registries. After 16 years, pPCI-treated patients had a sustained lower rate of composite endpoint compared to patients treated with fibrinolysis in the overall cohort [58.7% vs. 62.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.98], and among patients transported for pPCI (58.7% vs. 64.1%; HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.96). No difference in all-cause mortality was found, but cardiac mortality was reduced by an absolute of 4.4% in favour of pPCI (18.3% vs. 22.7%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.98). pPCI postponed a main event with 12.3 months in average compared to fibrinolysis (95% CI 5.0-19.5). Conclusion The benefit of pPCI over fibrinolysis was maintained at 16-year follow-up. pPCI reduced the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization for MI, reduced cardiac mortality, and delayed average time to a main event by approximately 1 year.

KW - Fibrinolysis

KW - Long-term outcome

KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - ST-elevation myocardial infarction

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31504424

AN - SCOPUS:85075210794

VL - 41

SP - 847

EP - 854

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 253187292