Web-tutorials in context: affordances and usability perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Web-tutorials in context : affordances and usability perspectives. / Lund, Haakon; Pors, Niels Ole.

In: Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2012, p. 197-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lund, H & Pors, NO 2012, 'Web-tutorials in context: affordances and usability perspectives', Performance Measurement and Metrics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041211284731

APA

Lund, H., & Pors, N. O. (2012). Web-tutorials in context: affordances and usability perspectives. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 13(3), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041211284731

Vancouver

Lund H, Pors NO. Web-tutorials in context: affordances and usability perspectives. Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2012;13(3):197-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041211284731

Author

Lund, Haakon ; Pors, Niels Ole. / Web-tutorials in context : affordances and usability perspectives. In: Performance Measurement and Metrics. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 197-211.

Bibtex

@article{9587f5f37b184a9e921c14defcd4ff06,
title = "Web-tutorials in context: affordances and usability perspectives",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of the research is to investigate Norwegian web‐tutorials in contexts consisting of organizational issues and different forms of usability in relation to students{\textquoteright} perception and use of the system. Further, the research investigates the usefulness of the concepts concerning affordances and different forms of usability.Design/methodology/approach– The research has employed a variety of data‐collection methods including interviews with librarians, interviews and focus group interviews with students, coupled with tests of their capabilities using the systems. A detailed research design is included in the paper.Findings– In the organizational context, the research confirmed the importance of a close contact with teachers and disciplines and it was also clearly indicated that disciplines that supported an evidence‐based approach to research were much more active in using the tutorials as part of the requirements. Further, examples of organizational amnesia are discussed, pointing to the necessity for leadership support and systematic knowledge sharing. System Usability Scores are analysed in relation to solution of tasks and interesting relations are analysed. The perceptions of students were also interesting, clearly indicating marked differences in perceptions depending on study year and discipline but also different valuation of the different forms of usability. Overall, the research indicated a discrepancy between design intentions versus use and perception of the tutorials.Originality/value– The theoretical approach has not been used often in library and information science research and the paper indicates its usefulness for further research. The findings presented in the paper also have implications for the way libraries design and promote information literacy tools.",
keywords = "Academic libraries; Affordances; Information literacy; usability",
author = "Haakon Lund and Pors, {Niels Ole}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/14678041211284731",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "197--211",
journal = "Performance Measurement and Metrics",
issn = "1467-8047",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Web-tutorials in context

T2 - affordances and usability perspectives

AU - Lund, Haakon

AU - Pors, Niels Ole

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of the research is to investigate Norwegian web‐tutorials in contexts consisting of organizational issues and different forms of usability in relation to students’ perception and use of the system. Further, the research investigates the usefulness of the concepts concerning affordances and different forms of usability.Design/methodology/approach– The research has employed a variety of data‐collection methods including interviews with librarians, interviews and focus group interviews with students, coupled with tests of their capabilities using the systems. A detailed research design is included in the paper.Findings– In the organizational context, the research confirmed the importance of a close contact with teachers and disciplines and it was also clearly indicated that disciplines that supported an evidence‐based approach to research were much more active in using the tutorials as part of the requirements. Further, examples of organizational amnesia are discussed, pointing to the necessity for leadership support and systematic knowledge sharing. System Usability Scores are analysed in relation to solution of tasks and interesting relations are analysed. The perceptions of students were also interesting, clearly indicating marked differences in perceptions depending on study year and discipline but also different valuation of the different forms of usability. Overall, the research indicated a discrepancy between design intentions versus use and perception of the tutorials.Originality/value– The theoretical approach has not been used often in library and information science research and the paper indicates its usefulness for further research. The findings presented in the paper also have implications for the way libraries design and promote information literacy tools.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of the research is to investigate Norwegian web‐tutorials in contexts consisting of organizational issues and different forms of usability in relation to students’ perception and use of the system. Further, the research investigates the usefulness of the concepts concerning affordances and different forms of usability.Design/methodology/approach– The research has employed a variety of data‐collection methods including interviews with librarians, interviews and focus group interviews with students, coupled with tests of their capabilities using the systems. A detailed research design is included in the paper.Findings– In the organizational context, the research confirmed the importance of a close contact with teachers and disciplines and it was also clearly indicated that disciplines that supported an evidence‐based approach to research were much more active in using the tutorials as part of the requirements. Further, examples of organizational amnesia are discussed, pointing to the necessity for leadership support and systematic knowledge sharing. System Usability Scores are analysed in relation to solution of tasks and interesting relations are analysed. The perceptions of students were also interesting, clearly indicating marked differences in perceptions depending on study year and discipline but also different valuation of the different forms of usability. Overall, the research indicated a discrepancy between design intentions versus use and perception of the tutorials.Originality/value– The theoretical approach has not been used often in library and information science research and the paper indicates its usefulness for further research. The findings presented in the paper also have implications for the way libraries design and promote information literacy tools.

KW - Academic libraries; Affordances; Information literacy; usability

U2 - 10.1108/14678041211284731

DO - 10.1108/14678041211284731

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 197

EP - 211

JO - Performance Measurement and Metrics

JF - Performance Measurement and Metrics

SN - 1467-8047

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 47066441