Validation of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Diagnostic Assessment for Dementia in Arabic: A Study in Lebanon
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Validation of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Diagnostic Assessment for Dementia in Arabic : A Study in Lebanon. / Phung, Kieu T T; Chaaya, Monique; Waldemar, Gunhild; Atweh, Samir; Asmar, Khalil; Ghusn, Husam; Karam, Georges; Sawaya, Raja; Khoury, Rose Mary; Zeinaty, Ibrahim; Salman, Sandrine; Hammoud, Salem; Radwan, Wael; Bassil, Nazem; Prince, Martin.
In: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 12.2014, p. 282-290.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Diagnostic Assessment for Dementia in Arabic
T2 - A Study in Lebanon
AU - Phung, Kieu T T
AU - Chaaya, Monique
AU - Waldemar, Gunhild
AU - Atweh, Samir
AU - Asmar, Khalil
AU - Ghusn, Husam
AU - Karam, Georges
AU - Sawaya, Raja
AU - Khoury, Rose Mary
AU - Zeinaty, Ibrahim
AU - Salman, Sandrine
AU - Hammoud, Salem
AU - Radwan, Wael
AU - Bassil, Nazem
AU - Prince, Martin
N1 - © The Author(s) 2014.
PY - 2014/12
Y1 - 2014/12
N2 - OBJECTIVES: In the North Africa and Middle East region, the illiteracy rates among older people are high, posing a great challenge to cognitive assessment. Validated diagnostic instruments for dementia in Arabic are lacking, hampering the development of dementia research in the region. The study aimed at validating the Arabic version of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group (DRG) diagnostic assessment for dementia to determine whether it is suitable for case ascertainment in epidemiological research.METHODS: A total of 244 participants older than 65 years were included, 100 with normal cognition and 144 with mild to moderate dementia. Dementia was diagnosed by clinicians according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) criteria. Depression was diagnosed using the Geriatric Mental State. Trained interviewers blind to the cognitive status of the participants administered the 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment to the participants and interviewed the caregivers. The discriminatory ability of the 10/66 DRG assessment and its subcomponents were evaluated against the clinical diagnoses.RESULTS: Half of the participants had no formal education and 49% of them were depressed. The 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment showed excellent sensitivity (92.0%), specificity (95.1%), positive predictive value (PPV, 92.9%), and low false-positive rates among controls with no formal education (8.1%) and depression (5.6%). Each subcomponent of the 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment independently predicted dementia diagnosis. The predictive ability of the 10/66 DRG assessment was superior to that of its subcomponents.CONCLUSION: The 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment for dementia is well suited for case ascertainment in epidemiological studies among Arabic-speaking older population with high prevalence of illiteracy.
AB - OBJECTIVES: In the North Africa and Middle East region, the illiteracy rates among older people are high, posing a great challenge to cognitive assessment. Validated diagnostic instruments for dementia in Arabic are lacking, hampering the development of dementia research in the region. The study aimed at validating the Arabic version of the 10/66 Dementia Research Group (DRG) diagnostic assessment for dementia to determine whether it is suitable for case ascertainment in epidemiological research.METHODS: A total of 244 participants older than 65 years were included, 100 with normal cognition and 144 with mild to moderate dementia. Dementia was diagnosed by clinicians according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) criteria. Depression was diagnosed using the Geriatric Mental State. Trained interviewers blind to the cognitive status of the participants administered the 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment to the participants and interviewed the caregivers. The discriminatory ability of the 10/66 DRG assessment and its subcomponents were evaluated against the clinical diagnoses.RESULTS: Half of the participants had no formal education and 49% of them were depressed. The 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment showed excellent sensitivity (92.0%), specificity (95.1%), positive predictive value (PPV, 92.9%), and low false-positive rates among controls with no formal education (8.1%) and depression (5.6%). Each subcomponent of the 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment independently predicted dementia diagnosis. The predictive ability of the 10/66 DRG assessment was superior to that of its subcomponents.CONCLUSION: The 10/66 DRG diagnostic assessment for dementia is well suited for case ascertainment in epidemiological studies among Arabic-speaking older population with high prevalence of illiteracy.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - Dementia
KW - Depression
KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
KW - Educational Status
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Language
KW - Lebanon
KW - Male
KW - Prevalence
KW - Questionnaires
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Translating
U2 - 10.1177/0891988714532019
DO - 10.1177/0891988714532019
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 24771602
VL - 27
SP - 282
EP - 290
JO - Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
JF - Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
SN - 0891-9887
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 138426192