Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. / Jensen, Siri Beier; Jarvis, Virginia; Zadik, Yehuda; Barasch, Andrei; Ariyawardana, Anura; Hovan, Allan; Yarom, Noam; Lalla, Rajesh V.; Bowen, Joanne; Elad, Sharon.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 21, No. 11, 31.07.2013, p. 3223-3232.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jensen, SB, Jarvis, V, Zadik, Y, Barasch, A, Ariyawardana, A, Hovan, A, Yarom, N, Lalla, RV, Bowen, J & Elad, S 2013, 'Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 3223-3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1884-6

APA

Jensen, S. B., Jarvis, V., Zadik, Y., Barasch, A., Ariyawardana, A., Hovan, A., Yarom, N., Lalla, R. V., Bowen, J., & Elad, S. (2013). Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(11), 3223-3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1884-6

Vancouver

Jensen SB, Jarvis V, Zadik Y, Barasch A, Ariyawardana A, Hovan A et al. Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013 Jul 31;21(11):3223-3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1884-6

Author

Jensen, Siri Beier ; Jarvis, Virginia ; Zadik, Yehuda ; Barasch, Andrei ; Ariyawardana, Anura ; Hovan, Allan ; Yarom, Noam ; Lalla, Rajesh V. ; Bowen, Joanne ; Elad, Sharon. / Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 11. pp. 3223-3232.

Bibtex

@article{d35a1b51acb44af7ac4dcbceb1ba4f7b,
title = "Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients",
abstract = "AbstractPURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of the following agents for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM): allopurinol, midline mucosa-sparing radiation blocks, payayor, pentoxifylline, timing of radiation therapy (RT) (morning versus late afternoon), pilocarpine, bethanechol, chewing gum, propantheline, and tetrachlorodecaoxide.METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, no guideline possible.RESULTS: A total of 32 papers across 10 interventions were examined. New suggestions were developed against the use of systemic pilocarpine administered orally for prevention of OM during RT in head and neck cancer patients and in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation, prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A suggestion was also made against the use of systemic pentoxifylline administered orally for the prevention of OM in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. No guideline was possible for any other agent reviewed due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence.CONCLUSIONS: None of the agents reviewed was determined to be effective for the prevention or treatment of OM. Two agents, pilocarpine and pentoxifylline, were determined to be ineffective, in the populations listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on other interventions.",
author = "Jensen, {Siri Beier} and Virginia Jarvis and Yehuda Zadik and Andrei Barasch and Anura Ariyawardana and Allan Hovan and Noam Yarom and Lalla, {Rajesh V.} and Joanne Bowen and Sharon Elad",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-013-1884-6",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "3223--3232",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of miscellaneous agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients

AU - Jensen, Siri Beier

AU - Jarvis, Virginia

AU - Zadik, Yehuda

AU - Barasch, Andrei

AU - Ariyawardana, Anura

AU - Hovan, Allan

AU - Yarom, Noam

AU - Lalla, Rajesh V.

AU - Bowen, Joanne

AU - Elad, Sharon

PY - 2013/7/31

Y1 - 2013/7/31

N2 - AbstractPURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of the following agents for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM): allopurinol, midline mucosa-sparing radiation blocks, payayor, pentoxifylline, timing of radiation therapy (RT) (morning versus late afternoon), pilocarpine, bethanechol, chewing gum, propantheline, and tetrachlorodecaoxide.METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, no guideline possible.RESULTS: A total of 32 papers across 10 interventions were examined. New suggestions were developed against the use of systemic pilocarpine administered orally for prevention of OM during RT in head and neck cancer patients and in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation, prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A suggestion was also made against the use of systemic pentoxifylline administered orally for the prevention of OM in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. No guideline was possible for any other agent reviewed due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence.CONCLUSIONS: None of the agents reviewed was determined to be effective for the prevention or treatment of OM. Two agents, pilocarpine and pentoxifylline, were determined to be ineffective, in the populations listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on other interventions.

AB - AbstractPURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of the following agents for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis (OM): allopurinol, midline mucosa-sparing radiation blocks, payayor, pentoxifylline, timing of radiation therapy (RT) (morning versus late afternoon), pilocarpine, bethanechol, chewing gum, propantheline, and tetrachlorodecaoxide.METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society for Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, no guideline possible.RESULTS: A total of 32 papers across 10 interventions were examined. New suggestions were developed against the use of systemic pilocarpine administered orally for prevention of OM during RT in head and neck cancer patients and in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy, with or without total body irradiation, prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A suggestion was also made against the use of systemic pentoxifylline administered orally for the prevention of OM in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. No guideline was possible for any other agent reviewed due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence.CONCLUSIONS: None of the agents reviewed was determined to be effective for the prevention or treatment of OM. Two agents, pilocarpine and pentoxifylline, were determined to be ineffective, in the populations listed above. Additional well-designed research is needed on other interventions.

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-013-1884-6

DO - 10.1007/s00520-013-1884-6

M3 - Review

C2 - 23900593

VL - 21

SP - 3223

EP - 3232

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 49471950