Renal denervation

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Renal denervation. / Olsen, Lene Kjær; Kamper, Anne-Lise; Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo.

In: European Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 2, 03.2015, p. 95-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Olsen, LK, Kamper, A-L, Svendsen, JH & Feldt-Rasmussen, B 2015, 'Renal denervation', European Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.009

APA

Olsen, L. K., Kamper, A-L., Svendsen, J. H., & Feldt-Rasmussen, B. (2015). Renal denervation. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 26(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.009

Vancouver

Olsen LK, Kamper A-L, Svendsen JH, Feldt-Rasmussen B. Renal denervation. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2015 Mar;26(2):95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.009

Author

Olsen, Lene Kjær ; Kamper, Anne-Lise ; Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup ; Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo. / Renal denervation. In: European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 95-105.

Bibtex

@article{8665e52539e84a33b9c266372e67c9ae,
title = "Renal denervation",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal denervation (RDN) has, within recent years, been suggested as a novel treatment option for patients with resistant hypertension. This review summarizes the current knowledge on this procedure as well as limitations and questions that remain to be answered.RECENT FINDINGS: The Symplicity HTN-1 (2009) and HTN-2 (2010) studies re-introduced an old treatment approach for resistant hypertension and showed that catheter-based RDN was feasible and resulted in substantial blood pressure (BP) reductions. However, they also raised questions of durability of BP reduction, correct patient selection, anatomical and physiological effects of RDN as well as possible beneficial effects on other diseases with increased sympathetic activity. The long awaited Symplicity HTN-3 (2014) results illustrated that the RDN group and the sham-group had similar reductions in BP.SUMMARY: Initial studies demonstrated that RDN in patients with resistant hypertension was both feasible and safe and indicated that RDN may lead to impressive reductions in BP. However, recent controlled studies question the BP lowering effect of RDN treatment. Large-scale registry data still supports the favorable BP reducing effect of RDN. We suggest that, in the near future, RDN should not be performed outside clinical studies. The degree of denervation between individual operators and between different catheters and techniques used should be clarified. The major challenge ahead is to identify which patients could benefit from RDN, to clarify the lack of an immediate procedural success parameter, and to establish further documentation of overall effect of treatment such as long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.",
keywords = "Antihypertensive Agents, Catheter Ablation, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Renal Artery, Sympathectomy, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Olsen, {Lene Kj{\ae}r} and Anne-Lise Kamper and Svendsen, {Jesper Hastrup} and Bo Feldt-Rasmussen",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.009",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "95--105",
journal = "European Journal of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0953-6205",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renal denervation

AU - Olsen, Lene Kjær

AU - Kamper, Anne-Lise

AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup

AU - Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo

N1 - Copyright © 2015 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal denervation (RDN) has, within recent years, been suggested as a novel treatment option for patients with resistant hypertension. This review summarizes the current knowledge on this procedure as well as limitations and questions that remain to be answered.RECENT FINDINGS: The Symplicity HTN-1 (2009) and HTN-2 (2010) studies re-introduced an old treatment approach for resistant hypertension and showed that catheter-based RDN was feasible and resulted in substantial blood pressure (BP) reductions. However, they also raised questions of durability of BP reduction, correct patient selection, anatomical and physiological effects of RDN as well as possible beneficial effects on other diseases with increased sympathetic activity. The long awaited Symplicity HTN-3 (2014) results illustrated that the RDN group and the sham-group had similar reductions in BP.SUMMARY: Initial studies demonstrated that RDN in patients with resistant hypertension was both feasible and safe and indicated that RDN may lead to impressive reductions in BP. However, recent controlled studies question the BP lowering effect of RDN treatment. Large-scale registry data still supports the favorable BP reducing effect of RDN. We suggest that, in the near future, RDN should not be performed outside clinical studies. The degree of denervation between individual operators and between different catheters and techniques used should be clarified. The major challenge ahead is to identify which patients could benefit from RDN, to clarify the lack of an immediate procedural success parameter, and to establish further documentation of overall effect of treatment such as long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal denervation (RDN) has, within recent years, been suggested as a novel treatment option for patients with resistant hypertension. This review summarizes the current knowledge on this procedure as well as limitations and questions that remain to be answered.RECENT FINDINGS: The Symplicity HTN-1 (2009) and HTN-2 (2010) studies re-introduced an old treatment approach for resistant hypertension and showed that catheter-based RDN was feasible and resulted in substantial blood pressure (BP) reductions. However, they also raised questions of durability of BP reduction, correct patient selection, anatomical and physiological effects of RDN as well as possible beneficial effects on other diseases with increased sympathetic activity. The long awaited Symplicity HTN-3 (2014) results illustrated that the RDN group and the sham-group had similar reductions in BP.SUMMARY: Initial studies demonstrated that RDN in patients with resistant hypertension was both feasible and safe and indicated that RDN may lead to impressive reductions in BP. However, recent controlled studies question the BP lowering effect of RDN treatment. Large-scale registry data still supports the favorable BP reducing effect of RDN. We suggest that, in the near future, RDN should not be performed outside clinical studies. The degree of denervation between individual operators and between different catheters and techniques used should be clarified. The major challenge ahead is to identify which patients could benefit from RDN, to clarify the lack of an immediate procedural success parameter, and to establish further documentation of overall effect of treatment such as long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

KW - Antihypertensive Agents

KW - Catheter Ablation

KW - Humans

KW - Hypertension

KW - Kidney

KW - Renal Artery

KW - Sympathectomy

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.009

M3 - Review

C2 - 25676808

VL - 26

SP - 95

EP - 105

JO - European Journal of Internal Medicine

JF - European Journal of Internal Medicine

SN - 0953-6205

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 162190892