Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. / Olsen, Rie; Greisen, Gorm; Schrøder, Morten; Brok, Jesper.

In: Neonatology, Vol. 109, No. 2, 2016, p. 105-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Olsen, R, Greisen, G, Schrøder, M & Brok, J 2016, 'Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies', Neonatology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 105-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441274

APA

Olsen, R., Greisen, G., Schrøder, M., & Brok, J. (2016). Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Neonatology, 109(2), 105-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441274

Vancouver

Olsen R, Greisen G, Schrøder M, Brok J. Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Neonatology. 2016;109(2):105-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441274

Author

Olsen, Rie ; Greisen, Gorm ; Schrøder, Morten ; Brok, Jesper. / Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. In: Neonatology. 2016 ; Vol. 109, No. 2. pp. 105-12.

Bibtex

@article{8a0e3a72776f41d7aface85ab0a3f9a2,
title = "Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a major morbidity and cause of mortality in preterm neonates. Probiotics seem to have a beneficial role in preventing NEC, which is confirmed in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We therefore aimed to review and confirm the efficacy of probiotics in preterm neonates obtained in observational studies.OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of prophylactic probiotics in preterm infants.METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed searching PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library) and www.clinicaltrials.gov. Reference lists of reviews of RCTs were also searched. Included studies were observational studies that enrolled preterm infants <37 weeks of gestational age. Trials were included if they administered any probiotics and measured at least one clinical outcome (e.g. NEC, all-cause mortality, sepsis or long-term development scores). Two authors extracted characteristics and outcomes from included studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used, and heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 test.RESULTS: We included 12 studies with 10,800 premature neonates (5,144 receiving prophylactic probiotics and 5,656 controls). The meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased incidence of NEC (risk ratio, RR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.39-0.78; p = 0.0006) and mortality (RR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; p < 0.0001). Sepsis did not differ significantly between the two groups (RR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; p = 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of NEC and mortality in preterm infants. The effect sizes are similar to findings in meta-analyses of RCTs. However, the optimal strain, dose and timing need further investigation.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Rie Olsen and Gorm Greisen and Morten Schr{\o}der and Jesper Brok",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1159/000441274",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "105--12",
journal = "Neonatology",
issn = "1661-7800",
publisher = "S Karger AG",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prophylactic Probiotics for Preterm Infants

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

AU - Olsen, Rie

AU - Greisen, Gorm

AU - Schrøder, Morten

AU - Brok, Jesper

N1 - © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a major morbidity and cause of mortality in preterm neonates. Probiotics seem to have a beneficial role in preventing NEC, which is confirmed in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We therefore aimed to review and confirm the efficacy of probiotics in preterm neonates obtained in observational studies.OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of prophylactic probiotics in preterm infants.METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed searching PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library) and www.clinicaltrials.gov. Reference lists of reviews of RCTs were also searched. Included studies were observational studies that enrolled preterm infants <37 weeks of gestational age. Trials were included if they administered any probiotics and measured at least one clinical outcome (e.g. NEC, all-cause mortality, sepsis or long-term development scores). Two authors extracted characteristics and outcomes from included studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used, and heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 test.RESULTS: We included 12 studies with 10,800 premature neonates (5,144 receiving prophylactic probiotics and 5,656 controls). The meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased incidence of NEC (risk ratio, RR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.39-0.78; p = 0.0006) and mortality (RR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; p < 0.0001). Sepsis did not differ significantly between the two groups (RR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; p = 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of NEC and mortality in preterm infants. The effect sizes are similar to findings in meta-analyses of RCTs. However, the optimal strain, dose and timing need further investigation.

AB - BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a major morbidity and cause of mortality in preterm neonates. Probiotics seem to have a beneficial role in preventing NEC, which is confirmed in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We therefore aimed to review and confirm the efficacy of probiotics in preterm neonates obtained in observational studies.OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of prophylactic probiotics in preterm infants.METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed searching PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library) and www.clinicaltrials.gov. Reference lists of reviews of RCTs were also searched. Included studies were observational studies that enrolled preterm infants <37 weeks of gestational age. Trials were included if they administered any probiotics and measured at least one clinical outcome (e.g. NEC, all-cause mortality, sepsis or long-term development scores). Two authors extracted characteristics and outcomes from included studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used, and heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 test.RESULTS: We included 12 studies with 10,800 premature neonates (5,144 receiving prophylactic probiotics and 5,656 controls). The meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased incidence of NEC (risk ratio, RR = 0.55, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.39-0.78; p = 0.0006) and mortality (RR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; p < 0.0001). Sepsis did not differ significantly between the two groups (RR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.74-1.00; p = 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of NEC and mortality in preterm infants. The effect sizes are similar to findings in meta-analyses of RCTs. However, the optimal strain, dose and timing need further investigation.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1159/000441274

DO - 10.1159/000441274

M3 - Review

C2 - 26624488

VL - 109

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - Neonatology

JF - Neonatology

SN - 1661-7800

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 164477460