Management by objectives and results in the Nordic countries: Origins and developments, differences and similarities
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research
Standard
Management by objectives and results in the Nordic countries: Origins and developments, differences and similarities. / Kristiansen, Mads Bøge.
2013. Paper presented at American Society for Public Administration Annual Conference, New Orleans, United States.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CONF
T1 - Management by objectives and results in the Nordic countries:
AU - Kristiansen, Mads Bøge
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In order to identify continuity or change this paper analyzes the development processes of the Management by Objectives and Results (MBOR) discourse over time in central government in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. The paper shows that MBOR has been marked by continuity since its introduction in the 1980s, and has become a central element in the steering and management of agencies in central government in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Nevertheless gradual changes that have altered the direction of the MBOR discourse over time can also be identified. The direction changes from autonomy and a simple MBOR sys-tem in the early years toward more control and a more comprehensive system in the 1990s, and back again toward more autonomy and a less comprehensive MBOR system in recent years. The development processes in the three countries are characterized by some differences, but seem also to share numerous similarities. Explanations of these differences and similarities are discussed in the final section of the paper.
AB - In order to identify continuity or change this paper analyzes the development processes of the Management by Objectives and Results (MBOR) discourse over time in central government in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. The paper shows that MBOR has been marked by continuity since its introduction in the 1980s, and has become a central element in the steering and management of agencies in central government in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Nevertheless gradual changes that have altered the direction of the MBOR discourse over time can also be identified. The direction changes from autonomy and a simple MBOR sys-tem in the early years toward more control and a more comprehensive system in the 1990s, and back again toward more autonomy and a less comprehensive MBOR system in recent years. The development processes in the three countries are characterized by some differences, but seem also to share numerous similarities. Explanations of these differences and similarities are discussed in the final section of the paper.
M3 - Paper
Y2 - 14 March 2013 through 18 March 2014
ER -
ID: 108018538