Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges. / Shewale, Jitesh B; Correa, Arlene M; Baker, Carla M; Villafane-Ferriol, Nicole; Hofstetter, Wayne L; Jordan, Victoria S; Kehlet, Henrik; Lewis, Katie M; Mehran, Reza J; Summers, Barbara L; Schaub, Diane; Wilks, Sonia A; Swisher, Stephen G; University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 261, No. 6, 06.2015, p. 1114-1123.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Shewale, JB, Correa, AM, Baker, CM, Villafane-Ferriol, N, Hofstetter, WL, Jordan, VS, Kehlet, H, Lewis, KM, Mehran, RJ, Summers, BL, Schaub, D, Wilks, SA, Swisher, SG & University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group 2015, 'Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges', Annals of Surgery, vol. 261, no. 6, pp. 1114-1123. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971

APA

Shewale, J. B., Correa, A. M., Baker, C. M., Villafane-Ferriol, N., Hofstetter, W. L., Jordan, V. S., Kehlet, H., Lewis, K. M., Mehran, R. J., Summers, B. L., Schaub, D., Wilks, S. A., Swisher, S. G., & University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group (2015). Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges. Annals of Surgery, 261(6), 1114-1123. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971

Vancouver

Shewale JB, Correa AM, Baker CM, Villafane-Ferriol N, Hofstetter WL, Jordan VS et al. Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges. Annals of Surgery. 2015 Jun;261(6):1114-1123. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971

Author

Shewale, Jitesh B ; Correa, Arlene M ; Baker, Carla M ; Villafane-Ferriol, Nicole ; Hofstetter, Wayne L ; Jordan, Victoria S ; Kehlet, Henrik ; Lewis, Katie M ; Mehran, Reza J ; Summers, Barbara L ; Schaub, Diane ; Wilks, Sonia A ; Swisher, Stephen G ; University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group. / Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges. In: Annals of Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 261, No. 6. pp. 1114-1123.

Bibtex

@article{568343b13720466b8aa14050d544bc14,
title = "Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol (FTEP) on esophageal cancer patients' safety, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital charges.BACKGROUND: FTEP involved transferring patients to the telemetry unit instead of the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after esophagectomy.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 708 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer during the 4 years before (group A; 322 patients) or 4 years after (group B; 386 patients) the institution of an FTEP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, LOS, and hospital charges were reviewed.RESULTS: Compared with group A, group B had significantly shorter median LOS (12 days vs 8 days; P < 0.001); lower mean numbers of SICU days (4.5 days vs 1.2 days; P < 0.001) and telemetry days (12.7 days vs 9.7 days; P < 0.001); and lower rates of atrial arrhythmia (27% vs 19%; P = 0.013) and pulmonary complications (27% vs 20%; P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed FTEP to be associated with shorter LOS (P < 0.001) even after adjustment for predictors like tumor histology and location. FTEP was also associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 0.655; 95% confidence interval = 0.456, 0.942; P = 0.022). In addition, the median hospital charges associated with primary admission and readmission within 90 days for group B ($65,649) were lower than that for group A ($79,117; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that an FTEP reduces patients' LOS, perioperative morbidity, and hospital charges.",
author = "Shewale, {Jitesh B} and Correa, {Arlene M} and Baker, {Carla M} and Nicole Villafane-Ferriol and Hofstetter, {Wayne L} and Jordan, {Victoria S} and Henrik Kehlet and Lewis, {Katie M} and Mehran, {Reza J} and Summers, {Barbara L} and Diane Schaub and Wilks, {Sonia A} and Swisher, {Stephen G} and {University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group}",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971",
language = "English",
volume = "261",
pages = "1114--1123",
journal = "Advances in Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges

AU - Shewale, Jitesh B

AU - Correa, Arlene M

AU - Baker, Carla M

AU - Villafane-Ferriol, Nicole

AU - Hofstetter, Wayne L

AU - Jordan, Victoria S

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Lewis, Katie M

AU - Mehran, Reza J

AU - Summers, Barbara L

AU - Schaub, Diane

AU - Wilks, Sonia A

AU - Swisher, Stephen G

AU - University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol (FTEP) on esophageal cancer patients' safety, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital charges.BACKGROUND: FTEP involved transferring patients to the telemetry unit instead of the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after esophagectomy.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 708 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer during the 4 years before (group A; 322 patients) or 4 years after (group B; 386 patients) the institution of an FTEP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, LOS, and hospital charges were reviewed.RESULTS: Compared with group A, group B had significantly shorter median LOS (12 days vs 8 days; P < 0.001); lower mean numbers of SICU days (4.5 days vs 1.2 days; P < 0.001) and telemetry days (12.7 days vs 9.7 days; P < 0.001); and lower rates of atrial arrhythmia (27% vs 19%; P = 0.013) and pulmonary complications (27% vs 20%; P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed FTEP to be associated with shorter LOS (P < 0.001) even after adjustment for predictors like tumor histology and location. FTEP was also associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 0.655; 95% confidence interval = 0.456, 0.942; P = 0.022). In addition, the median hospital charges associated with primary admission and readmission within 90 days for group B ($65,649) were lower than that for group A ($79,117; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that an FTEP reduces patients' LOS, perioperative morbidity, and hospital charges.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol (FTEP) on esophageal cancer patients' safety, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital charges.BACKGROUND: FTEP involved transferring patients to the telemetry unit instead of the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after esophagectomy.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 708 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer during the 4 years before (group A; 322 patients) or 4 years after (group B; 386 patients) the institution of an FTEP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, LOS, and hospital charges were reviewed.RESULTS: Compared with group A, group B had significantly shorter median LOS (12 days vs 8 days; P < 0.001); lower mean numbers of SICU days (4.5 days vs 1.2 days; P < 0.001) and telemetry days (12.7 days vs 9.7 days; P < 0.001); and lower rates of atrial arrhythmia (27% vs 19%; P = 0.013) and pulmonary complications (27% vs 20%; P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed FTEP to be associated with shorter LOS (P < 0.001) even after adjustment for predictors like tumor histology and location. FTEP was also associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 0.655; 95% confidence interval = 0.456, 0.942; P = 0.022). In addition, the median hospital charges associated with primary admission and readmission within 90 days for group B ($65,649) were lower than that for group A ($79,117; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that an FTEP reduces patients' LOS, perioperative morbidity, and hospital charges.

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25243545

VL - 261

SP - 1114

EP - 1123

JO - Advances in Surgery

JF - Advances in Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 152272319