How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points? / Hilden, Jørgen.

In: Evidence - Based Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, p. 92.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hilden, J 2007, 'How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points?', Evidence - Based Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 92. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.12.3.92

APA

Hilden, J. (2007). How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points? Evidence - Based Medicine, 12(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.12.3.92

Vancouver

Hilden J. How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points? Evidence - Based Medicine. 2007;12(3):92. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm.12.3.92

Author

Hilden, Jørgen. / How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points?. In: Evidence - Based Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 92.

Bibtex

@article{ab4af2909d4a11debc73000ea68e967b,

title = "How should clinicians interpret results reflecting the effect of an intervention on composite end points?",

abstract = "Udgivelsesdato: 2007-Jun",

author = "J{\o}rgen Hilden",

note = "Keywords: Endpoint Determination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic",

year = "2007",

doi = "10.1136/ebm.12.3.92",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "92",

journal = "BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine",

issn = "2515-446X",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "3",