Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. / Broch, Stine Wamberg; Strange, Niels; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl; Wilson, Kerrie A.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 92, 2013, p. 78-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Broch, SW, Strange, N, Jacobsen, JB & Wilson, KA 2013, 'Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution', Ecological Economics, vol. 92, pp. 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017

APA

Broch, S. W., Strange, N., Jacobsen, J. B., & Wilson, K. A. (2013). Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. Ecological Economics, 92, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017

Vancouver

Broch SW, Strange N, Jacobsen JB, Wilson KA. Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. Ecological Economics. 2013;92:78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017

Author

Broch, Stine Wamberg ; Strange, Niels ; Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl ; Wilson, Kerrie A. / Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. In: Ecological Economics. 2013 ; Vol. 92. pp. 78-86.

Bibtex

@article{346d278855f1406da02588a89699c033,
title = "Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution",
abstract = "The supply of ecosystem goods and services is spatially heterogeneous and the provision of such goods and services is also influenced by landowners' willingness to provide. This is particularly the case in countries such as Denmark where many properties are privately owned. However, little attention has previously been given to the relationship between farmers' willingness to provide a good or service and the spatial heterogeneity associated with their demand. In this study farmers' willingness to participate in afforestation contracts are investigated using a choice experiment of various contracts with the purpose to provide: groundwater protection, biodiversity conservation or recreation. We employ a random parameter logit model to analyse the relationship between farmers' preferences for afforestation purposes and the spatial variables; groundwater interests, species richness, human population density, forest cover and hunting. The results show that increasing human population density significantly increases farmers' required compensation with respect to recreational activities. Furthermore, there is a significant effect of hunting which decreases compensation required by the farmers to enter an afforestation project. The share of groundwater and forest cover does not significantly influence preferences. We conclude that spatial variations should be considered when designing conservation policies.",
author = "Broch, {Stine Wamberg} and Niels Strange and Jacobsen, {Jette Bredahl} and Wilson, {Kerrie A.}",
note = "Specoal issue: Land Use",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "78--86",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution

AU - Broch, Stine Wamberg

AU - Strange, Niels

AU - Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl

AU - Wilson, Kerrie A.

N1 - Specoal issue: Land Use

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The supply of ecosystem goods and services is spatially heterogeneous and the provision of such goods and services is also influenced by landowners' willingness to provide. This is particularly the case in countries such as Denmark where many properties are privately owned. However, little attention has previously been given to the relationship between farmers' willingness to provide a good or service and the spatial heterogeneity associated with their demand. In this study farmers' willingness to participate in afforestation contracts are investigated using a choice experiment of various contracts with the purpose to provide: groundwater protection, biodiversity conservation or recreation. We employ a random parameter logit model to analyse the relationship between farmers' preferences for afforestation purposes and the spatial variables; groundwater interests, species richness, human population density, forest cover and hunting. The results show that increasing human population density significantly increases farmers' required compensation with respect to recreational activities. Furthermore, there is a significant effect of hunting which decreases compensation required by the farmers to enter an afforestation project. The share of groundwater and forest cover does not significantly influence preferences. We conclude that spatial variations should be considered when designing conservation policies.

AB - The supply of ecosystem goods and services is spatially heterogeneous and the provision of such goods and services is also influenced by landowners' willingness to provide. This is particularly the case in countries such as Denmark where many properties are privately owned. However, little attention has previously been given to the relationship between farmers' willingness to provide a good or service and the spatial heterogeneity associated with their demand. In this study farmers' willingness to participate in afforestation contracts are investigated using a choice experiment of various contracts with the purpose to provide: groundwater protection, biodiversity conservation or recreation. We employ a random parameter logit model to analyse the relationship between farmers' preferences for afforestation purposes and the spatial variables; groundwater interests, species richness, human population density, forest cover and hunting. The results show that increasing human population density significantly increases farmers' required compensation with respect to recreational activities. Furthermore, there is a significant effect of hunting which decreases compensation required by the farmers to enter an afforestation project. The share of groundwater and forest cover does not significantly influence preferences. We conclude that spatial variations should be considered when designing conservation policies.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.017

M3 - Journal article

VL - 92

SP - 78

EP - 86

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -

ID: 44706984