A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section. / Hyttel-Sørensen, Simon; Hessel, Trine Witzner; la Cour, Amalia; Greisen, Gorm.

In: Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 5, No. 10, 2014, p. 3671-3683.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hyttel-Sørensen, S, Hessel, TW, la Cour, A & Greisen, G 2014, 'A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section', Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 3671-3683. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003671

APA

Hyttel-Sørensen, S., Hessel, T. W., la Cour, A., & Greisen, G. (2014). A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section. Biomedical Optics Express, 5(10), 3671-3683. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003671

Vancouver

Hyttel-Sørensen S, Hessel TW, la Cour A, Greisen G. A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section. Biomedical Optics Express. 2014;5(10):3671-3683. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003671

Author

Hyttel-Sørensen, Simon ; Hessel, Trine Witzner ; la Cour, Amalia ; Greisen, Gorm. / A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section. In: Biomedical Optics Express. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 10. pp. 3671-3683.

Bibtex

@article{5a2c33d51dd6497da4b89b94a40af8ad,
title = "A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section",
abstract = "Previously the NIRS oximeter OxyPrem was calibrated by comparison to the INVOS in a blood-lipid phantom. The aim of the present study was to test this calibration clinically. During vasculur occlusions in 10 adults and after birth in 25 term infants the relationship was OxyPrem = 1.24 x INVOS - 23.6% and OxyPrem = 1.15 x INVOS - 16.2% on the adult arm and infant head, respectively. The precsion during steady state was 4.0% (CI 3.4% to 4.6%) and 3.4% (CI 2.9% to 3.9%) on the arm, and 6.7% (CI 5.9% to 7.6%) and 4.7% (CI 3.5% to 5.9%) on the infant head for OxyPrem and INVOS, respectively. We conclude that the calibration on the blood-lipid phantom was unsuccessful in achieving agreement in clinical measurements.",
author = "Simon Hyttel-S{\o}rensen and Hessel, {Trine Witzner} and {la Cour}, Amalia and Gorm Greisen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1364/BOE.5.003671",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "3671--3683",
journal = "Biomedical Optics Express",
issn = "2156-7085",
publisher = "Optical Society of America",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between two NIRS oximeters (INVOS, OxyPrem) using measurement on the arm of adults and head of infants after caesarean section

AU - Hyttel-Sørensen, Simon

AU - Hessel, Trine Witzner

AU - la Cour, Amalia

AU - Greisen, Gorm

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Previously the NIRS oximeter OxyPrem was calibrated by comparison to the INVOS in a blood-lipid phantom. The aim of the present study was to test this calibration clinically. During vasculur occlusions in 10 adults and after birth in 25 term infants the relationship was OxyPrem = 1.24 x INVOS - 23.6% and OxyPrem = 1.15 x INVOS - 16.2% on the adult arm and infant head, respectively. The precsion during steady state was 4.0% (CI 3.4% to 4.6%) and 3.4% (CI 2.9% to 3.9%) on the arm, and 6.7% (CI 5.9% to 7.6%) and 4.7% (CI 3.5% to 5.9%) on the infant head for OxyPrem and INVOS, respectively. We conclude that the calibration on the blood-lipid phantom was unsuccessful in achieving agreement in clinical measurements.

AB - Previously the NIRS oximeter OxyPrem was calibrated by comparison to the INVOS in a blood-lipid phantom. The aim of the present study was to test this calibration clinically. During vasculur occlusions in 10 adults and after birth in 25 term infants the relationship was OxyPrem = 1.24 x INVOS - 23.6% and OxyPrem = 1.15 x INVOS - 16.2% on the adult arm and infant head, respectively. The precsion during steady state was 4.0% (CI 3.4% to 4.6%) and 3.4% (CI 2.9% to 3.9%) on the arm, and 6.7% (CI 5.9% to 7.6%) and 4.7% (CI 3.5% to 5.9%) on the infant head for OxyPrem and INVOS, respectively. We conclude that the calibration on the blood-lipid phantom was unsuccessful in achieving agreement in clinical measurements.

U2 - 10.1364/BOE.5.003671

DO - 10.1364/BOE.5.003671

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25360381

VL - 5

SP - 3671

EP - 3683

JO - Biomedical Optics Express

JF - Biomedical Optics Express

SN - 2156-7085

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 137497226