Outcomes of a 12-week ecologically valid observational study of first treatment with methylphenidate in a representative clinical sample of drug naïve children with ADHD

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 1.46 MB, PDF document

  • Kristine Kaalund-Brok
  • Houmann, Tine
  • Marie Bang Hebsgaard
  • Maj Britt Glenn Lauritsen
  • Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm
  • Helene Grønning
  • Lise Darling
  • Susanna Reinert-Petersen
  • Morten Aagaard Petersen
  • Jens Richardt Møllegaard Jepsen
  • Pagsberg, Anne Katrine
  • Kerstin Jessica Plessen
  • Henrik Berg Rasmussen
  • Jeppesen, Pia

Randomized placebo-controlled trials have reported efficacy of methylphenidate (MPH) for Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, selection biases due to strict entry criteria may limit the generalizability of the findings. Few ecologically valid studies have investigated effectiveness of MPH in representative clinical populations of children. This independently funded study aims to describe treatment responses and their predictors during the first 12 weeks of MPH treatment using repeated measurements of symptoms and adverse reactions (ARs) to treatment in 207 children recently diagnosed with ADHD. The children were consecutively included from the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Services, The Capital Region of Denmark. The children (mean age, 9.6 years [range 7-12], 75.4% males) were titrated with MPH, based on weekly assessments of symptoms (18-item ADHD-rating scale scores, ADHD-RS-C) and ARs. At study-end 187 (90.8%) children reached a mean end-dose of 1.0 mg/kg/day. A normalisation/borderline normalisation on ADHD-RS-C was achieved for 168 (81.2%) children on the Inattention and/or the Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subscale in week 12, and 31 (15.0%) children were nonresponders, which was defined as absence of normalisation/borderline normalisation (n = 19) or discontinuation due to ARs (n = 12), and eight (3.8%) children dropped out from follow- up. Nonresponders were characterised by more severe symptoms of Hyperactivity- Impulsivity and global impairment before the treatment. ARs were few; the most prominent were appetite reduction and weight loss. A decrease in AR-like symptoms during the treatment period questions the validity of currently available standard instruments designed to measure ARs of MPH. This ecologically valid observational study supports prior randomized placebo-controlled trials; 81.2% of the children responded favourably in multiple domains with few harmful effects to carefully titrated MPH. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT04366609.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0253727
JournalPlos One
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1-29
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Kaalund-Brok et al.

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk

No data available

ID: 304281938