Understanding quality in declarative process modeling through the mental models of experts

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt


  • Fulltext

    Accepteret manuskript, 916 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Amine Abbad Andaloussi
  • Christopher J. Davis
  • Andrea Burattin
  • Hugo A. López
  • Slaats, Tijs
  • Barbara Weber

Imperative process models have become immensely popular. However, their use is usually limited to rigid and repetitive processes. Considering the inherent flexibility in most processes in the real-world and the increased need for managing knowledge-intensive processes, the adoption of declarative languages becomes more pertinent than ever. While the quality of imperative models has been extensively investigated in the literature, little is known about the dimensions affecting the quality of declarative models. This work takes an advanced stride to investigate the quality of declarative models. Following the theory of Personal Construct Psychology (PCT), our research introduces a novel method within the Business Process Management (BPM) field to explore quality in the eyes of expert modelers. The findings of this work summarize the dimensions defining the quality of declarative models. The outcome shows the potential of PCT as a basis to discover quality dimensions and advances our understanding of quality in declarative process models.

TitelBusiness Process Management : 18th International Conference, BPM 2020, Seville, Spain, September 13–18, 2020, Proceedings
Antal sider18
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-030-58665-2
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-3-030-58666-9
StatusUdgivet - 2020
Begivenhed18th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2020 - Seville, Spanien
Varighed: 13 sep. 202018 sep. 2020


Konference18th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2020
NavnLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk

Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 250812501