A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. / Grand, Johannes; Meyer, Anna Sp; Kjaergaard, Jesper; Wiberg, Sebastian; Thomsen, Jakob H; Frydland, Martin; Ostrowski, Sisse R; Johansson, Pär I; Hassager, Christian.

I: European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, Bind 9, Nr. 4_suppl, 2020, s. S100-S109.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Grand, J, Meyer, AS, Kjaergaard, J, Wiberg, S, Thomsen, JH, Frydland, M, Ostrowski, SR, Johansson, PI & Hassager, C 2020, 'A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest', European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, bind 9, nr. 4_suppl, s. S100-S109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872619900095

APA

Grand, J., Meyer, A. S., Kjaergaard, J., Wiberg, S., Thomsen, J. H., Frydland, M., Ostrowski, S. R., Johansson, P. I., & Hassager, C. (2020). A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 9(4_suppl), S100-S109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872619900095

Vancouver

Grand J, Meyer AS, Kjaergaard J, Wiberg S, Thomsen JH, Frydland M o.a. A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2020;9(4_suppl):S100-S109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872619900095

Author

Grand, Johannes ; Meyer, Anna Sp ; Kjaergaard, Jesper ; Wiberg, Sebastian ; Thomsen, Jakob H ; Frydland, Martin ; Ostrowski, Sisse R ; Johansson, Pär I ; Hassager, Christian. / A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. I: European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2020 ; Bind 9, Nr. 4_suppl. s. S100-S109.

Bibtex

@article{44431b9ec0784903aa1274557a38e581,
title = "A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: After resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, mean arterial pressure below 65 mm Hg is avoided with vasopressors. A higher blood-pressure target could potentially improve outcome. The aim of this pilot trial was to investigate the effect of a higher mean arterial pressure target on biomarkers of organ injury.METHODS: This was a single-centre, double-blind trial of 50 consecutive, comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg (MAP65) or 72 mm Hg (MAP72). Modified blood pressure modules with a -10% offset were used, enabling a double-blind study design. End-points were biomarkers of organ injury including markers of endothelial integrity (soluble trombomodulin) brain damage (neuron-specific enolase) and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate).RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in MAP72 with a mean difference of 5 mm Hg (pgroup=0.03). After 48 h, soluble trombomodulin (median (interquartile range)) was 8.2 (6.7-12.9) ng/ml and 8.3 (6.0-10.8) ng/ml (p=0.29), neuron-specific enolase was 20 (13-31 μg/l) and 18 (13-44 μg/l) p=0.79) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (mean (±standard deviation)) was 61±19 ml/min/1.73m2 and 48±22 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.08) for the MAP72 and MAP65 groups, respectively. Renal replacement therapy was needed in eight patients (31%) in MAP65 and three patients (13%) in MAP72 (p=0.14).CONCLUSIONS: Double-blind allocation to different mean arterial pressure targets is feasible in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. A mean arterial pressure target of 72 mm Hg compared to 65 mm Hg did not result in improved biomarkers of organ injury. We observed a trend towards preserved renal function in the MAP72 group.",
author = "Johannes Grand and Meyer, {Anna Sp} and Jesper Kjaergaard and Sebastian Wiberg and Thomsen, {Jakob H} and Martin Frydland and Ostrowski, {Sisse R} and Johansson, {P{\"a}r I} and Christian Hassager",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/2048872619900095",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "S100--S109",
journal = "European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care",
issn = "2048-8726",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4_suppl",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised double-blind pilot trial comparing a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg versus 72 mm Hg after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AU - Grand, Johannes

AU - Meyer, Anna Sp

AU - Kjaergaard, Jesper

AU - Wiberg, Sebastian

AU - Thomsen, Jakob H

AU - Frydland, Martin

AU - Ostrowski, Sisse R

AU - Johansson, Pär I

AU - Hassager, Christian

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - BACKGROUND: After resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, mean arterial pressure below 65 mm Hg is avoided with vasopressors. A higher blood-pressure target could potentially improve outcome. The aim of this pilot trial was to investigate the effect of a higher mean arterial pressure target on biomarkers of organ injury.METHODS: This was a single-centre, double-blind trial of 50 consecutive, comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg (MAP65) or 72 mm Hg (MAP72). Modified blood pressure modules with a -10% offset were used, enabling a double-blind study design. End-points were biomarkers of organ injury including markers of endothelial integrity (soluble trombomodulin) brain damage (neuron-specific enolase) and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate).RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in MAP72 with a mean difference of 5 mm Hg (pgroup=0.03). After 48 h, soluble trombomodulin (median (interquartile range)) was 8.2 (6.7-12.9) ng/ml and 8.3 (6.0-10.8) ng/ml (p=0.29), neuron-specific enolase was 20 (13-31 μg/l) and 18 (13-44 μg/l) p=0.79) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (mean (±standard deviation)) was 61±19 ml/min/1.73m2 and 48±22 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.08) for the MAP72 and MAP65 groups, respectively. Renal replacement therapy was needed in eight patients (31%) in MAP65 and three patients (13%) in MAP72 (p=0.14).CONCLUSIONS: Double-blind allocation to different mean arterial pressure targets is feasible in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. A mean arterial pressure target of 72 mm Hg compared to 65 mm Hg did not result in improved biomarkers of organ injury. We observed a trend towards preserved renal function in the MAP72 group.

AB - BACKGROUND: After resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, mean arterial pressure below 65 mm Hg is avoided with vasopressors. A higher blood-pressure target could potentially improve outcome. The aim of this pilot trial was to investigate the effect of a higher mean arterial pressure target on biomarkers of organ injury.METHODS: This was a single-centre, double-blind trial of 50 consecutive, comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a mean arterial pressure target of 65 mm Hg (MAP65) or 72 mm Hg (MAP72). Modified blood pressure modules with a -10% offset were used, enabling a double-blind study design. End-points were biomarkers of organ injury including markers of endothelial integrity (soluble trombomodulin) brain damage (neuron-specific enolase) and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate).RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in MAP72 with a mean difference of 5 mm Hg (pgroup=0.03). After 48 h, soluble trombomodulin (median (interquartile range)) was 8.2 (6.7-12.9) ng/ml and 8.3 (6.0-10.8) ng/ml (p=0.29), neuron-specific enolase was 20 (13-31 μg/l) and 18 (13-44 μg/l) p=0.79) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (mean (±standard deviation)) was 61±19 ml/min/1.73m2 and 48±22 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.08) for the MAP72 and MAP65 groups, respectively. Renal replacement therapy was needed in eight patients (31%) in MAP65 and three patients (13%) in MAP72 (p=0.14).CONCLUSIONS: Double-blind allocation to different mean arterial pressure targets is feasible in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. A mean arterial pressure target of 72 mm Hg compared to 65 mm Hg did not result in improved biomarkers of organ injury. We observed a trend towards preserved renal function in the MAP72 group.

U2 - 10.1177/2048872619900095

DO - 10.1177/2048872619900095

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32004081

VL - 9

SP - S100-S109

JO - European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care

JF - European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care

SN - 2048-8726

IS - 4_suppl

ER -

ID: 261239654