Who cares about fish welfare? a Norwegian study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Who cares about fish welfare? a Norwegian study. / Ellingsen, Kristian; Grimsrud, Kristine; Nielsen, Hanne Marie; Mejdell, Cecilie; Olesen, Ingrid; Honkanen, Pirjo; Navrud, Ståle; Gamborg, Christian; Sandøe, Peter.

I: British Food Journal, Bind 117, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 257-273.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ellingsen, K, Grimsrud, K, Nielsen, HM, Mejdell, C, Olesen, I, Honkanen, P, Navrud, S, Gamborg, C & Sandøe, P 2015, 'Who cares about fish welfare? a Norwegian study', British Food Journal, bind 117, nr. 1, s. 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2013-0223

APA

Ellingsen, K., Grimsrud, K., Nielsen, H. M., Mejdell, C., Olesen, I., Honkanen, P., Navrud, S., Gamborg, C., & Sandøe, P. (2015). Who cares about fish welfare? a Norwegian study. British Food Journal, 117(1), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2013-0223

Vancouver

Ellingsen K, Grimsrud K, Nielsen HM, Mejdell C, Olesen I, Honkanen P o.a. Who cares about fish welfare? a Norwegian study. British Food Journal. 2015;117(1):257-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2013-0223

Author

Ellingsen, Kristian ; Grimsrud, Kristine ; Nielsen, Hanne Marie ; Mejdell, Cecilie ; Olesen, Ingrid ; Honkanen, Pirjo ; Navrud, Ståle ; Gamborg, Christian ; Sandøe, Peter. / Who cares about fish welfare? a Norwegian study. I: British Food Journal. 2015 ; Bind 117, Nr. 1. s. 257-273.

Bibtex

@article{120f028db93d474eb9458ecf631e7b86,
title = "Who cares about fish welfare?: a Norwegian study",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to assess how concerned Norwegians are about fish welfare; second, to investigate Norwegians{\textquoteright} willingness to pay for salmon filet made from welfare-assured farmed fish with high levels of welfare; and third, to examine Norwegian opinions about the appropriate way to pay for better welfare standards in fish production. Design/methodology/approach– On the basis of two focus group sessions, a survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to a representative sample of 2,147 Norwegian households via e-mail. Findings– Results showed that the Norwegian public is concerned about fish welfare and is willing to pay a price premium for products made from welfare-assured fish. Norwegian consumers do not, however, want to be the only ones paying for fish welfare, as the main responsibility for fish welfare lies with producers and the Government. Research limitations/implications– In this study willingness to pay is measured using a hypothetical choice experiment. Values people express as citizens, however, may not accurately predict true consumer behaviour. This is generally referred to as “citizen-consumer duality” and may have affected the results. Practical implications– The study shows that there is a national market for welfare-assured fish products, but education initiatives focusing on fish farming and fish welfare issues would further influence the attitudes and purchasing habits of Norwegian consumers. Originality/value– Although concern about animal welfare is growing in the western world, very little attention has been given to the welfare of fish. This paper aims to make up for this by presenting a study of how Norwegians view the welfare of farmed salmon.",
author = "Kristian Ellingsen and Kristine Grimsrud and Nielsen, {Hanne Marie} and Cecilie Mejdell and Ingrid Olesen and Pirjo Honkanen and St{\aa}le Navrud and Christian Gamborg and Peter Sand{\o}e",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/BFJ-08-2013-0223",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "257--273",
journal = "British Food Journal",
issn = "0007-070X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who cares about fish welfare?

T2 - a Norwegian study

AU - Ellingsen, Kristian

AU - Grimsrud, Kristine

AU - Nielsen, Hanne Marie

AU - Mejdell, Cecilie

AU - Olesen, Ingrid

AU - Honkanen, Pirjo

AU - Navrud, Ståle

AU - Gamborg, Christian

AU - Sandøe, Peter

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to assess how concerned Norwegians are about fish welfare; second, to investigate Norwegians’ willingness to pay for salmon filet made from welfare-assured farmed fish with high levels of welfare; and third, to examine Norwegian opinions about the appropriate way to pay for better welfare standards in fish production. Design/methodology/approach– On the basis of two focus group sessions, a survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to a representative sample of 2,147 Norwegian households via e-mail. Findings– Results showed that the Norwegian public is concerned about fish welfare and is willing to pay a price premium for products made from welfare-assured fish. Norwegian consumers do not, however, want to be the only ones paying for fish welfare, as the main responsibility for fish welfare lies with producers and the Government. Research limitations/implications– In this study willingness to pay is measured using a hypothetical choice experiment. Values people express as citizens, however, may not accurately predict true consumer behaviour. This is generally referred to as “citizen-consumer duality” and may have affected the results. Practical implications– The study shows that there is a national market for welfare-assured fish products, but education initiatives focusing on fish farming and fish welfare issues would further influence the attitudes and purchasing habits of Norwegian consumers. Originality/value– Although concern about animal welfare is growing in the western world, very little attention has been given to the welfare of fish. This paper aims to make up for this by presenting a study of how Norwegians view the welfare of farmed salmon.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to assess how concerned Norwegians are about fish welfare; second, to investigate Norwegians’ willingness to pay for salmon filet made from welfare-assured farmed fish with high levels of welfare; and third, to examine Norwegian opinions about the appropriate way to pay for better welfare standards in fish production. Design/methodology/approach– On the basis of two focus group sessions, a survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to a representative sample of 2,147 Norwegian households via e-mail. Findings– Results showed that the Norwegian public is concerned about fish welfare and is willing to pay a price premium for products made from welfare-assured fish. Norwegian consumers do not, however, want to be the only ones paying for fish welfare, as the main responsibility for fish welfare lies with producers and the Government. Research limitations/implications– In this study willingness to pay is measured using a hypothetical choice experiment. Values people express as citizens, however, may not accurately predict true consumer behaviour. This is generally referred to as “citizen-consumer duality” and may have affected the results. Practical implications– The study shows that there is a national market for welfare-assured fish products, but education initiatives focusing on fish farming and fish welfare issues would further influence the attitudes and purchasing habits of Norwegian consumers. Originality/value– Although concern about animal welfare is growing in the western world, very little attention has been given to the welfare of fish. This paper aims to make up for this by presenting a study of how Norwegians view the welfare of farmed salmon.

U2 - 10.1108/BFJ-08-2013-0223

DO - 10.1108/BFJ-08-2013-0223

M3 - Journal article

VL - 117

SP - 257

EP - 273

JO - British Food Journal

JF - British Food Journal

SN - 0007-070X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 130289534