TY - JOUR

T1 - What does framing theory add to our understanding of collective decision making in nitrogen management?

AU - Graversgaard, Morten

AU - Christensen, Andreas Aagaard

AU - Thorsøe, Martin Hvarregaard

AU - Vejre, Henrik

AU - Andersen, Peter Stubkjær

AU - Brock, Steen

AU - Kjeldsen, Chris

AU - Andersen, Erling

AU - Hansen, Line Block

AU - Piil, Kristoffer

AU - Olesen, Jørgen E.

AU - Dalgaard, Tommy

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - ContextExcess use of nitrogen fertilizer in agricultural landscapes is a threat to aquatic ecosystems, with effects manifesting at the scale of watersheds encompassing many farms. Collaborative processes involving farmers may be needed to achieve policies and decisions that are legitimate and sustainable in the long-term. Doing so depends on how arguments, positions and opinions are negotiated among farmers. We tested how framing theory may contribute to understanding such negotiations.ObjectivesThe study has two objectives: (1) to evaluate the outcome of a series of experiments using framing methodology for analyzing collective decision making processes in agricultural landscapes, and (2) to discuss the potentials of using framing theory in agricultural landscape and nitrogen planning.MethodsCollaborative scenario workshops with local stakeholders were organized in six case areas in Denmark. In each of the cases a participatory process was facilitated. The purpose of these meetings was to involve farmers in finding solutions to reduce nitrogen loads to aquatic recipients.ResultsTen different frames were identified. These explain a majority of the variation among opinions. Analysis show that frames were understood homogeneously by the informants, indicating that frames represent established models of thinking about the agro-environment. We provide a brief outline of the frames identified.ConclusionsWe conclude that framing theory holds the potential to clarify key discussion about formation of opinions and standpoints in discourse and debates about land use and nitrogen management. It is discussed how to further progress along this line of inquiry.

AB - ContextExcess use of nitrogen fertilizer in agricultural landscapes is a threat to aquatic ecosystems, with effects manifesting at the scale of watersheds encompassing many farms. Collaborative processes involving farmers may be needed to achieve policies and decisions that are legitimate and sustainable in the long-term. Doing so depends on how arguments, positions and opinions are negotiated among farmers. We tested how framing theory may contribute to understanding such negotiations.ObjectivesThe study has two objectives: (1) to evaluate the outcome of a series of experiments using framing methodology for analyzing collective decision making processes in agricultural landscapes, and (2) to discuss the potentials of using framing theory in agricultural landscape and nitrogen planning.MethodsCollaborative scenario workshops with local stakeholders were organized in six case areas in Denmark. In each of the cases a participatory process was facilitated. The purpose of these meetings was to involve farmers in finding solutions to reduce nitrogen loads to aquatic recipients.ResultsTen different frames were identified. These explain a majority of the variation among opinions. Analysis show that frames were understood homogeneously by the informants, indicating that frames represent established models of thinking about the agro-environment. We provide a brief outline of the frames identified.ConclusionsWe conclude that framing theory holds the potential to clarify key discussion about formation of opinions and standpoints in discourse and debates about land use and nitrogen management. It is discussed how to further progress along this line of inquiry.

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-021-01265-z

DO - 10.1007/s10980-021-01265-z

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 4139

EP - 4155

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

ER -