Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention: the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention : the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka. / Damerow, Sabine Margarete; Weerasinghe, Manjula; Madsen, Lizell Bustamante; Hansen, Kristian Schultz; Pearson, Melissa; Eddleston, Michael; Konradsen, Flemming.

I: Tropical Medicine & International Health, Bind 25, Nr. 10, 2020, s. 1205-1213.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Damerow, SM, Weerasinghe, M, Madsen, LB, Hansen, KS, Pearson, M, Eddleston, M & Konradsen, F 2020, 'Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention: the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka', Tropical Medicine & International Health, bind 25, nr. 10, s. 1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13470

APA

Damerow, S. M., Weerasinghe, M., Madsen, L. B., Hansen, K. S., Pearson, M., Eddleston, M., & Konradsen, F. (2020). Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention: the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 25(10), 1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13470

Vancouver

Damerow SM, Weerasinghe M, Madsen LB, Hansen KS, Pearson M, Eddleston M o.a. Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention: the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2020;25(10):1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13470

Author

Damerow, Sabine Margarete ; Weerasinghe, Manjula ; Madsen, Lizell Bustamante ; Hansen, Kristian Schultz ; Pearson, Melissa ; Eddleston, Michael ; Konradsen, Flemming. / Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention : the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka. I: Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2020 ; Bind 25, Nr. 10. s. 1205-1213.

Bibtex

@article{df4dc18598e046c9a377fbd0b57dd337,
title = "Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention: the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka",
abstract = "Objectives Suicide by pesticide self-poisoning is a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. While effectiveness studies are required to test alternative prevention approaches, economic evidence is lacking to inform decision-making in research priority setting. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the costs of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme for pesticide vendors seeking to prevent pesticide self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka and assess its potential for cost-effectiveness. Methods Ex-ante cost and cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) analyses were performed from a governmental perspective based on a three-year analytic horizon, using 'no programme' as a comparator. A programme model targeting all 535 pesticide shops in the North Central Province and border areas was applied. Total programme costs (TPC) were estimated in 2019 USD using an ingredients approach and 3% annual discounting. The Sri Lankan gross domestic product per capita and life years saved were used as CET and effectiveness measure, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results TPC were estimated at 31 603.03 USD. TPC were sensitive to cost changes of training material and equipment and the programme lifetime. The programme needs to prevent an estimated 0.23 fatal pesticide self-poisoning cases over three years to be considered cost-effective. In the sensitivity analyses, the highest number of fatal cases needed to be prevented to obtain cost-effectiveness was 4.55 over three years. Conclusions From an economic perspective, the programme has a very high potential to be cost-effective. Research assessing its effectiveness should therefore be completed, and research analysing its transferability to other settings prioritised.",
keywords = "pesticide self-poisoning, ex-ante economic evaluation, suicide prevention, research priority setting, cost-effectiveness threshold analysis, Sri Lanka, GLOBAL BURDEN, SUICIDE, STORAGE, DEATHS, CHOICE, IMPACT, HARM",
author = "Damerow, {Sabine Margarete} and Manjula Weerasinghe and Madsen, {Lizell Bustamante} and Hansen, {Kristian Schultz} and Melissa Pearson and Michael Eddleston and Flemming Konradsen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1111/tmi.13470",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1205--1213",
journal = "Tropical Medicine & International Health",
issn = "1360-2276",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using ex-ante economic evaluation to inform research priorities in pesticide self-poisoning prevention

T2 - the case of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme in rural Sri Lanka

AU - Damerow, Sabine Margarete

AU - Weerasinghe, Manjula

AU - Madsen, Lizell Bustamante

AU - Hansen, Kristian Schultz

AU - Pearson, Melissa

AU - Eddleston, Michael

AU - Konradsen, Flemming

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objectives Suicide by pesticide self-poisoning is a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. While effectiveness studies are required to test alternative prevention approaches, economic evidence is lacking to inform decision-making in research priority setting. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the costs of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme for pesticide vendors seeking to prevent pesticide self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka and assess its potential for cost-effectiveness. Methods Ex-ante cost and cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) analyses were performed from a governmental perspective based on a three-year analytic horizon, using 'no programme' as a comparator. A programme model targeting all 535 pesticide shops in the North Central Province and border areas was applied. Total programme costs (TPC) were estimated in 2019 USD using an ingredients approach and 3% annual discounting. The Sri Lankan gross domestic product per capita and life years saved were used as CET and effectiveness measure, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results TPC were estimated at 31 603.03 USD. TPC were sensitive to cost changes of training material and equipment and the programme lifetime. The programme needs to prevent an estimated 0.23 fatal pesticide self-poisoning cases over three years to be considered cost-effective. In the sensitivity analyses, the highest number of fatal cases needed to be prevented to obtain cost-effectiveness was 4.55 over three years. Conclusions From an economic perspective, the programme has a very high potential to be cost-effective. Research assessing its effectiveness should therefore be completed, and research analysing its transferability to other settings prioritised.

AB - Objectives Suicide by pesticide self-poisoning is a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. While effectiveness studies are required to test alternative prevention approaches, economic evidence is lacking to inform decision-making in research priority setting. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the costs of a shop-based gatekeeper training programme for pesticide vendors seeking to prevent pesticide self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka and assess its potential for cost-effectiveness. Methods Ex-ante cost and cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) analyses were performed from a governmental perspective based on a three-year analytic horizon, using 'no programme' as a comparator. A programme model targeting all 535 pesticide shops in the North Central Province and border areas was applied. Total programme costs (TPC) were estimated in 2019 USD using an ingredients approach and 3% annual discounting. The Sri Lankan gross domestic product per capita and life years saved were used as CET and effectiveness measure, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results TPC were estimated at 31 603.03 USD. TPC were sensitive to cost changes of training material and equipment and the programme lifetime. The programme needs to prevent an estimated 0.23 fatal pesticide self-poisoning cases over three years to be considered cost-effective. In the sensitivity analyses, the highest number of fatal cases needed to be prevented to obtain cost-effectiveness was 4.55 over three years. Conclusions From an economic perspective, the programme has a very high potential to be cost-effective. Research assessing its effectiveness should therefore be completed, and research analysing its transferability to other settings prioritised.

KW - pesticide self-poisoning

KW - ex-ante economic evaluation

KW - suicide prevention

KW - research priority setting

KW - cost-effectiveness threshold analysis

KW - Sri Lanka

KW - GLOBAL BURDEN

KW - SUICIDE

KW - STORAGE

KW - DEATHS

KW - CHOICE

KW - IMPACT

KW - HARM

U2 - 10.1111/tmi.13470

DO - 10.1111/tmi.13470

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32687625

VL - 25

SP - 1205

EP - 1213

JO - Tropical Medicine & International Health

JF - Tropical Medicine & International Health

SN - 1360-2276

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 247489559