Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement. / Henningsen, Geraldine; Henningsen, Arne; Henning, Christian H. C. A.

I: Empirical Economics, Bind 48, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 493-515.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Henningsen, G, Henningsen, A & Henning, CHCA 2015, 'Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement', Empirical Economics, bind 48, nr. 1, s. 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0882-y

APA

Henningsen, G., Henningsen, A., & Henning, C. H. C. A. (2015). Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement. Empirical Economics, 48(1), 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0882-y

Vancouver

Henningsen G, Henningsen A, Henning CHCA. Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement. Empirical Economics. 2015;48(1):493-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0882-y

Author

Henningsen, Geraldine ; Henningsen, Arne ; Henning, Christian H. C. A. / Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement. I: Empirical Economics. 2015 ; Bind 48, Nr. 1. s. 493-515.

Bibtex

@article{9adc1e4318dd4b019e36b4bef4e10025,
title = "Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement",
abstract = "We argue that in the presence of transaction costs, observed productivity measures may in many cases understate the true productivity, as production data seldom distinguish between resources entering the production process and resources of a similar type that are sacrificed for transaction costs. Hence, both the absolute productivity measures and, more importantly, the productivity ranking will be distorted. A major driver of transaction costs is poor access to information and contract enforcement assistance. Social networks often catalyse information exchange as well as generate trust and support. Hence, we use measures of a firm{\textquoteright}s access to social networks as a proxy for the transaction costs the firm faces. We develop a microeconomic production model that takes into account transaction costs and networks. Using a data set of 384 Polish farms, we empirically estimate this model and compare different parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric model specifications. Our results generally support our hypothesis. Especially, large trading networks and dense household networks have a positive influence on a farm{\textquoteright}s productivity. Furthermore, our results indicate that transaction costs have a measurable impact on the productivity ranking of the farms.",
author = "Geraldine Henningsen and Arne Henningsen and Henning, {Christian H. C. A.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s00181-014-0882-y",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "493--515",
journal = "Empirical Economics",
issn = "0377-7332",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transaction costs and social networks in productivity measurement

AU - Henningsen, Geraldine

AU - Henningsen, Arne

AU - Henning, Christian H. C. A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We argue that in the presence of transaction costs, observed productivity measures may in many cases understate the true productivity, as production data seldom distinguish between resources entering the production process and resources of a similar type that are sacrificed for transaction costs. Hence, both the absolute productivity measures and, more importantly, the productivity ranking will be distorted. A major driver of transaction costs is poor access to information and contract enforcement assistance. Social networks often catalyse information exchange as well as generate trust and support. Hence, we use measures of a firm’s access to social networks as a proxy for the transaction costs the firm faces. We develop a microeconomic production model that takes into account transaction costs and networks. Using a data set of 384 Polish farms, we empirically estimate this model and compare different parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric model specifications. Our results generally support our hypothesis. Especially, large trading networks and dense household networks have a positive influence on a farm’s productivity. Furthermore, our results indicate that transaction costs have a measurable impact on the productivity ranking of the farms.

AB - We argue that in the presence of transaction costs, observed productivity measures may in many cases understate the true productivity, as production data seldom distinguish between resources entering the production process and resources of a similar type that are sacrificed for transaction costs. Hence, both the absolute productivity measures and, more importantly, the productivity ranking will be distorted. A major driver of transaction costs is poor access to information and contract enforcement assistance. Social networks often catalyse information exchange as well as generate trust and support. Hence, we use measures of a firm’s access to social networks as a proxy for the transaction costs the firm faces. We develop a microeconomic production model that takes into account transaction costs and networks. Using a data set of 384 Polish farms, we empirically estimate this model and compare different parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric model specifications. Our results generally support our hypothesis. Especially, large trading networks and dense household networks have a positive influence on a farm’s productivity. Furthermore, our results indicate that transaction costs have a measurable impact on the productivity ranking of the farms.

U2 - 10.1007/s00181-014-0882-y

DO - 10.1007/s00181-014-0882-y

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 493

EP - 515

JO - Empirical Economics

JF - Empirical Economics

SN - 0377-7332

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 146333297