The Puzzle of Emotion Regulation: Development and Evaluation of the Tangram Emotion Coding Manual for Children
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The Puzzle of Emotion Regulation : Development and Evaluation of the Tangram Emotion Coding Manual for Children. / Hagstrøm, Julie; Spang, Katrine S.; Christiansen, Bianca Munkebo; Maigaard, Katrine; Vangkilde, Signe; Esbjørn, Barbara Hoff; Jepsen, Jens Richardt Møllegaard; Plessen, Kerstin Jessica.
I: Frontiers in Psychiatry, Bind 10, 723, 11.10.2019.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Puzzle of Emotion Regulation
T2 - Development and Evaluation of the Tangram Emotion Coding Manual for Children
AU - Hagstrøm, Julie
AU - Spang, Katrine S.
AU - Christiansen, Bianca Munkebo
AU - Maigaard, Katrine
AU - Vangkilde, Signe
AU - Esbjørn, Barbara Hoff
AU - Jepsen, Jens Richardt Møllegaard
AU - Plessen, Kerstin Jessica
PY - 2019/10/11
Y1 - 2019/10/11
N2 - The ability to regulate one’s emotions is crucial to engaging successfully in social contexts. Difficulties in emotion regulation are seen in multiple psychiatric disorders, prompting an increased interest in the concept. Suitable methods for assessing emotion regulation, however, are lacking. In this study, we investigated the interrater and intrarater reliability, construct validity, and content validity of a new observational method for evaluating children’s emotion regulation abilities (a complex puzzle task) in a sample of 62 children without psychiatric disorders and 23 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) aged 7–12, using intra-class correlation coefficients for the reliability analyses and Spearman’s rank-order correlations for analyses of convergent and discriminant validity. A panel of experts examined the content validity of the test, and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to investigate the ability of the test to differentiate the non-clinical group from the ADHD group. Results showed a high level of interrater and intrarater reliability of the test. There was mixed evidence for convergent and discriminant validity as expected due to the novelty and experimental nature of the test, making it difficult to compare with questionnaire-based measures. Content validity analysis was satisfactory, and the group comparison showed that the test differentiated the groups on the primary outcome measure. Overall, the measure demonstrated high feasibility and satisfactory psychometric properties. The generic nature of the test makes it suitable for use across psychiatric disorders and age groups with potential relevance in both research and clinical settings.
AB - The ability to regulate one’s emotions is crucial to engaging successfully in social contexts. Difficulties in emotion regulation are seen in multiple psychiatric disorders, prompting an increased interest in the concept. Suitable methods for assessing emotion regulation, however, are lacking. In this study, we investigated the interrater and intrarater reliability, construct validity, and content validity of a new observational method for evaluating children’s emotion regulation abilities (a complex puzzle task) in a sample of 62 children without psychiatric disorders and 23 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) aged 7–12, using intra-class correlation coefficients for the reliability analyses and Spearman’s rank-order correlations for analyses of convergent and discriminant validity. A panel of experts examined the content validity of the test, and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to investigate the ability of the test to differentiate the non-clinical group from the ADHD group. Results showed a high level of interrater and intrarater reliability of the test. There was mixed evidence for convergent and discriminant validity as expected due to the novelty and experimental nature of the test, making it difficult to compare with questionnaire-based measures. Content validity analysis was satisfactory, and the group comparison showed that the test differentiated the groups on the primary outcome measure. Overall, the measure demonstrated high feasibility and satisfactory psychometric properties. The generic nature of the test makes it suitable for use across psychiatric disorders and age groups with potential relevance in both research and clinical settings.
KW - construct validity
KW - content validity
KW - convergent validity
KW - development
KW - discriminant validity
KW - emotion regulation
KW - interrater reliability
KW - intrarater reliability
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00723
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00723
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31681035
AN - SCOPUS:85075836404
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
SN - 1664-0640
M1 - 723
ER -
ID: 236721723