TY - JOUR

T1 - The inflamed sputum in lower respiratory tract infection

T2 - l-lactate levels are correlated to neutrophil accumulation

AU - Fredman, Gabriella

AU - Kolpen, Mette

AU - Hertz, Frederik Boetius

AU - Petersen, Pelle Trier

AU - Jensen, Andreas Vestergaard

AU - Baunbæk-Egelund, Gertrud

AU - Ravn, Pernille

AU - Jensen, Peter Østrup

AU - Faurholt-Jepsen, Daniel

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are common, but little is known about the response of biomarkers of inflammation in the lungs. Therefore, our primary aim was to compare the concentration of l-lactate to the concentration of neutrophils in sputum and systemic markers of infection. Because it is difficult to differentiate viral and bacterial infection on the basis of clinical presentation in LRTI, our secondary aim was to evaluate if l- and d-lactate may serve as markers of local inflammation as representatives of neutrophils and bacteria, respectively. Methods: Patients with acute LRTI were prospectively recruited. Sputum samples were collected and analysed for neutrophil count, l-lactate and d-lactate. We had data on pathogens from sputum cultures and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (atypical bacteria, virus) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from blood. Results: In 44 sputum samples from 32 patients, the median (interquartile range (IQR)) sputum neutrophil granulocyte count was 0.615 × 107 cells/mL (0.236–1.575). The sputum neutrophil granulocyte count was associated with sputum l-lactate (p = 0.011) and CRP (p = 0.018), but not with d-lactate (p = 0.177). There was a strong association between sputum d-lactate and l-lactate (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: As l-lactate in sputum is closely correlated to sequestration of neutrophils in the lungs, l-lactate is a marker for local inflammation in LRTI and a potential biomarker in clinical management of LRTI. On expectorated sputum, d-lactate had no clinical relevance.

AB - Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are common, but little is known about the response of biomarkers of inflammation in the lungs. Therefore, our primary aim was to compare the concentration of l-lactate to the concentration of neutrophils in sputum and systemic markers of infection. Because it is difficult to differentiate viral and bacterial infection on the basis of clinical presentation in LRTI, our secondary aim was to evaluate if l- and d-lactate may serve as markers of local inflammation as representatives of neutrophils and bacteria, respectively. Methods: Patients with acute LRTI were prospectively recruited. Sputum samples were collected and analysed for neutrophil count, l-lactate and d-lactate. We had data on pathogens from sputum cultures and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (atypical bacteria, virus) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from blood. Results: In 44 sputum samples from 32 patients, the median (interquartile range (IQR)) sputum neutrophil granulocyte count was 0.615 × 107 cells/mL (0.236–1.575). The sputum neutrophil granulocyte count was associated with sputum l-lactate (p = 0.011) and CRP (p = 0.018), but not with d-lactate (p = 0.177). There was a strong association between sputum d-lactate and l-lactate (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: As l-lactate in sputum is closely correlated to sequestration of neutrophils in the lungs, l-lactate is a marker for local inflammation in LRTI and a potential biomarker in clinical management of LRTI. On expectorated sputum, d-lactate had no clinical relevance.

KW - lower respiratory tract infections

KW - lung infections

KW - sputum d-lactate

KW - sputum l-lactate

KW - sputum neutrophil granulocytes

U2 - 10.1111/apm.12913

DO - 10.1111/apm.12913

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30614067

AN - SCOPUS:85059569731

VL - 127

SP - 72

EP - 79

JO - A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica

JF - A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica

SN - 0903-4641

IS - 2

ER -