Rebel rule: A governmentality perspective

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Rebel rule : A governmentality perspective. / Hoffmann, Kasper; Verweijen, Judith.

I: African Affairs, Bind 118, Nr. 471, 2019, s. 352–374.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hoffmann, K & Verweijen, J 2019, 'Rebel rule: A governmentality perspective', African Affairs, bind 118, nr. 471, s. 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ady039

APA

Hoffmann, K., & Verweijen, J. (2019). Rebel rule: A governmentality perspective. African Affairs, 118(471), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ady039

Vancouver

Hoffmann K, Verweijen J. Rebel rule: A governmentality perspective. African Affairs. 2019;118(471):352–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ady039

Author

Hoffmann, Kasper ; Verweijen, Judith. / Rebel rule : A governmentality perspective. I: African Affairs. 2019 ; Bind 118, Nr. 471. s. 352–374.

Bibtex

@article{73318cf2d362403183b0a4780d20e192,
title = "Rebel rule: A governmentality perspective",
abstract = "Much of the recent literature on rebel governance and violent political orders works with {\textquoteleft}centred{\textquoteright} and instrumental understandings of power. In this view, power is seen as exercised over subjects, and as situated in rebel rulers, governance institutions, or ruling networks. Drawing on the study of the armed groups known as {\textquoteleft}Mai-Mai{\textquoteright} in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, this article instead adopts a governmentality perspective on rebel governance. It demonstrates how Mai-Mai groups rule not only through direct imposition but also, more subtly, by shaping people{\textquoteright}s subjectivities and self-conduct. We identify four clusters of techniques of Mai-Mai rule that relate respectively to ethnicity and custom; spirituality; {\textquoteleft}stateness{\textquoteright}; and patronage and protection. We argue that a governmentality perspective, with its focus on rationalities and practices of power, offers a fine-grained understanding of rebel rule that moves beyond common binaries such as coercion versus freedom. By showing its relevance for the analysis of rebel rule in the eastern Congo, our findings further strengthen the case for applying a governmentality perspective to non-Western political orders.",
author = "Kasper Hoffmann and Judith Verweijen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/afraf/ady039",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "352–374",
journal = "African Affairs",
issn = "0001-9909",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "471",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rebel rule

T2 - A governmentality perspective

AU - Hoffmann, Kasper

AU - Verweijen, Judith

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Much of the recent literature on rebel governance and violent political orders works with ‘centred’ and instrumental understandings of power. In this view, power is seen as exercised over subjects, and as situated in rebel rulers, governance institutions, or ruling networks. Drawing on the study of the armed groups known as ‘Mai-Mai’ in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, this article instead adopts a governmentality perspective on rebel governance. It demonstrates how Mai-Mai groups rule not only through direct imposition but also, more subtly, by shaping people’s subjectivities and self-conduct. We identify four clusters of techniques of Mai-Mai rule that relate respectively to ethnicity and custom; spirituality; ‘stateness’; and patronage and protection. We argue that a governmentality perspective, with its focus on rationalities and practices of power, offers a fine-grained understanding of rebel rule that moves beyond common binaries such as coercion versus freedom. By showing its relevance for the analysis of rebel rule in the eastern Congo, our findings further strengthen the case for applying a governmentality perspective to non-Western political orders.

AB - Much of the recent literature on rebel governance and violent political orders works with ‘centred’ and instrumental understandings of power. In this view, power is seen as exercised over subjects, and as situated in rebel rulers, governance institutions, or ruling networks. Drawing on the study of the armed groups known as ‘Mai-Mai’ in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, this article instead adopts a governmentality perspective on rebel governance. It demonstrates how Mai-Mai groups rule not only through direct imposition but also, more subtly, by shaping people’s subjectivities and self-conduct. We identify four clusters of techniques of Mai-Mai rule that relate respectively to ethnicity and custom; spirituality; ‘stateness’; and patronage and protection. We argue that a governmentality perspective, with its focus on rationalities and practices of power, offers a fine-grained understanding of rebel rule that moves beyond common binaries such as coercion versus freedom. By showing its relevance for the analysis of rebel rule in the eastern Congo, our findings further strengthen the case for applying a governmentality perspective to non-Western political orders.

U2 - 10.1093/afraf/ady039

DO - 10.1093/afraf/ady039

M3 - Journal article

VL - 118

SP - 352

EP - 374

JO - African Affairs

JF - African Affairs

SN - 0001-9909

IS - 471

ER -

ID: 203086607