TY - JOUR

T1 - Pharmacokinetics of tablet and liquid formulations of oral 6-mercaptopurine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AU - Larsen, Rikke Hebo

AU - Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie

AU - Grell, Kathrine

AU - Kristensen, Kim

AU - Pedersen, Line Gerner

AU - Brünner, Emilie Damgaard

AU - Als-Nielsen, Bodil

AU - Schmiegelow, Kjeld

AU - Nersting, Jacob

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - PURPOSE: Mercaptopurine (6MP) is essential to cure childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A liquid 6MP formulation was recently introduced to facilitate oral 6MP administration, especially to children. Its approval and bioequivalence with 6MP tablet were based on comparative pharmacokinetics in 60 healthy adults. Due to potential pharmacokinetic differences between healthy adults and children with ALL, we compared pharmacokinetics of tablet and liquid 6MP formulations in children with ALL.METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of 50 mg 6MP tablet (Puri-Nethol®) and 20 mg/ml 6MP liquid suspension (Xaluprine®) were compared in a non-blinded, random order, single-dose, cross-over study in 16 children with ALL (eight males). 6MP was administered after a 12 h fast, and 6MP plasma concentrations measured consecutively over seven hours post-dose. Pharmacokinetic outcomes were as follows: Area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and terminal half-life (T½).RESULTS: Liquid 6MP formulation resulted in a 26% lower AUC (p = 0.02) compared with tablet (median 1215 vs. 1805 h × nmol/l). No significant differences were observed for Cmax,Tmax and T½ (p = 0.28, p = 0.09, p = 0.41, respectively). Based on criteria declared by the World Health Organization the results did not establish non-inferiority of liquid 6MP formulation compared with 6MP tablet.CONCLUSION: Non-inferiority of liquid 6MP formulation compared with 6MP tablet was not demonstrated. Yet, maintenance therapy doses are adjusted by degree of myelosuppression and not by 6MP dose. Thus, in spite of a lower bioavailability, a liquid 6MP formulation is still desirable in a clinical setting, especially for children. However, if shifting between 6MP formulation is indicated, dose adjustments should be anticipated to maintain equivalent treatment intensity in children with ALL. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01906671). Date of registration: 24.07.13.

AB - PURPOSE: Mercaptopurine (6MP) is essential to cure childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A liquid 6MP formulation was recently introduced to facilitate oral 6MP administration, especially to children. Its approval and bioequivalence with 6MP tablet were based on comparative pharmacokinetics in 60 healthy adults. Due to potential pharmacokinetic differences between healthy adults and children with ALL, we compared pharmacokinetics of tablet and liquid 6MP formulations in children with ALL.METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of 50 mg 6MP tablet (Puri-Nethol®) and 20 mg/ml 6MP liquid suspension (Xaluprine®) were compared in a non-blinded, random order, single-dose, cross-over study in 16 children with ALL (eight males). 6MP was administered after a 12 h fast, and 6MP plasma concentrations measured consecutively over seven hours post-dose. Pharmacokinetic outcomes were as follows: Area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and terminal half-life (T½).RESULTS: Liquid 6MP formulation resulted in a 26% lower AUC (p = 0.02) compared with tablet (median 1215 vs. 1805 h × nmol/l). No significant differences were observed for Cmax,Tmax and T½ (p = 0.28, p = 0.09, p = 0.41, respectively). Based on criteria declared by the World Health Organization the results did not establish non-inferiority of liquid 6MP formulation compared with 6MP tablet.CONCLUSION: Non-inferiority of liquid 6MP formulation compared with 6MP tablet was not demonstrated. Yet, maintenance therapy doses are adjusted by degree of myelosuppression and not by 6MP dose. Thus, in spite of a lower bioavailability, a liquid 6MP formulation is still desirable in a clinical setting, especially for children. However, if shifting between 6MP formulation is indicated, dose adjustments should be anticipated to maintain equivalent treatment intensity in children with ALL. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01906671). Date of registration: 24.07.13.

U2 - 10.1007/s00280-020-04097-x

DO - 10.1007/s00280-020-04097-x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32519032

VL - 86

SP - 25

EP - 32

JO - Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Supplement

JF - Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Supplement

SN - 0943-9404

ER -