Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology. / Larsen, Heidi F.; Ahlström, Malin G.; Gjerdrum, Lise M.R.; Mogensen, Mette; Ghathian, Khaled; Calum, Henrik; Sørensen, Anne L.; Forman, Julie L.; Vandeven, Mark; Holerca, Marian N.; Du-Thumm, Laurence; Jorgensen, Lars N.; Ågren, Magnus S.

I: Wound Repair and Regeneration, Bind 25, Nr. 6, 11.2017, s. 984-993.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Larsen, HF, Ahlström, MG, Gjerdrum, LMR, Mogensen, M, Ghathian, K, Calum, H, Sørensen, AL, Forman, JL, Vandeven, M, Holerca, MN, Du-Thumm, L, Jorgensen, LN & Ågren, MS 2017, 'Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology', Wound Repair and Regeneration, bind 25, nr. 6, s. 984-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12605

APA

Larsen, H. F., Ahlström, M. G., Gjerdrum, L. M. R., Mogensen, M., Ghathian, K., Calum, H., Sørensen, A. L., Forman, J. L., Vandeven, M., Holerca, M. N., Du-Thumm, L., Jorgensen, L. N., & Ågren, M. S. (2017). Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 25(6), 984-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12605

Vancouver

Larsen HF, Ahlström MG, Gjerdrum LMR, Mogensen M, Ghathian K, Calum H o.a. Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2017 nov.;25(6):984-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12605

Author

Larsen, Heidi F. ; Ahlström, Malin G. ; Gjerdrum, Lise M.R. ; Mogensen, Mette ; Ghathian, Khaled ; Calum, Henrik ; Sørensen, Anne L. ; Forman, Julie L. ; Vandeven, Mark ; Holerca, Marian N. ; Du-Thumm, Laurence ; Jorgensen, Lars N. ; Ågren, Magnus S. / Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology. I: Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2017 ; Bind 25, Nr. 6. s. 984-993.

Bibtex

@article{dca85d9d40e0453c8470899db6ead6a4,
title = "Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology",
abstract = "We explored use of the suction-blister wound model in the assessment of not only epidermal regeneration but also pain, the microvascular response and bacteriology. The effects of topical zinc sulfate were studied to articulate the methodologies in this double-blind trial. One epidermal suction blister (10 mm) was induced on each buttock in 30 healthy volunteers (15 females:15 males) and deroofed on day 0. The wounds were randomized to daily treatment with 1.4% zinc sulfate shower gel (n = 20), placebo (n = 20) or control (n = 20). Digital photography coupled with planimetry, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement and optical coherence tomography (OCT) was benchmarked to the gold standard of histology of 60 full-thickness wound biopsies on day 4. Pain increased after application of the shower gels. Microvessel density, determined from OCT images, increased from day 0 to day 2 in the three groups but increased more with the placebo than with the zinc shower gel (p = 0.003) or the control treatment (p = 0.002) and correlated (rS = 0.313, p = 0.015) with the inflammatory response on day 4, as determined by histology. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were more common in wounds compared with skin (p = 0.002) and was reduced (p = 0.030) with zinc sulfate treatment. Planimetric analysis of digital wound images was not biased (p = 0.234) compared with histology, and TEWL measurements showed no correlation (rS = 0.052, p = 0.691) with epithelialization. Neoepidermal formation, determined by histology, did not differ (p = 0.290) among the groups. Zinc sulfate reduced (p = 0.031) the release of lactate dehydrogenase from cultured gel-treated keratinocytes isolated from the blister roofs. Therefore, combination of the standardized suction-blister wound model with noninvasive planimetry and OCT is a useful tool for assessing wound therapies. Zinc sulfate transiently dampened inflammation and reduced bacterial growth.",
author = "Larsen, {Heidi F.} and Ahlstr{\"o}m, {Malin G.} and Gjerdrum, {Lise M.R.} and Mette Mogensen and Khaled Ghathian and Henrik Calum and S{\o}rensen, {Anne L.} and Forman, {Julie L.} and Mark Vandeven and Holerca, {Marian N.} and Laurence Du-Thumm and Jorgensen, {Lars N.} and {\AA}gren, {Magnus S.}",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/wrr.12605",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "984--993",
journal = "Wound Repair and Regeneration",
issn = "1067-1927",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Noninvasive measurement of reepithelialization and microvascularity of suction-blister wounds with benchmarking to histology

AU - Larsen, Heidi F.

AU - Ahlström, Malin G.

AU - Gjerdrum, Lise M.R.

AU - Mogensen, Mette

AU - Ghathian, Khaled

AU - Calum, Henrik

AU - Sørensen, Anne L.

AU - Forman, Julie L.

AU - Vandeven, Mark

AU - Holerca, Marian N.

AU - Du-Thumm, Laurence

AU - Jorgensen, Lars N.

AU - Ågren, Magnus S.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - We explored use of the suction-blister wound model in the assessment of not only epidermal regeneration but also pain, the microvascular response and bacteriology. The effects of topical zinc sulfate were studied to articulate the methodologies in this double-blind trial. One epidermal suction blister (10 mm) was induced on each buttock in 30 healthy volunteers (15 females:15 males) and deroofed on day 0. The wounds were randomized to daily treatment with 1.4% zinc sulfate shower gel (n = 20), placebo (n = 20) or control (n = 20). Digital photography coupled with planimetry, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement and optical coherence tomography (OCT) was benchmarked to the gold standard of histology of 60 full-thickness wound biopsies on day 4. Pain increased after application of the shower gels. Microvessel density, determined from OCT images, increased from day 0 to day 2 in the three groups but increased more with the placebo than with the zinc shower gel (p = 0.003) or the control treatment (p = 0.002) and correlated (rS = 0.313, p = 0.015) with the inflammatory response on day 4, as determined by histology. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were more common in wounds compared with skin (p = 0.002) and was reduced (p = 0.030) with zinc sulfate treatment. Planimetric analysis of digital wound images was not biased (p = 0.234) compared with histology, and TEWL measurements showed no correlation (rS = 0.052, p = 0.691) with epithelialization. Neoepidermal formation, determined by histology, did not differ (p = 0.290) among the groups. Zinc sulfate reduced (p = 0.031) the release of lactate dehydrogenase from cultured gel-treated keratinocytes isolated from the blister roofs. Therefore, combination of the standardized suction-blister wound model with noninvasive planimetry and OCT is a useful tool for assessing wound therapies. Zinc sulfate transiently dampened inflammation and reduced bacterial growth.

AB - We explored use of the suction-blister wound model in the assessment of not only epidermal regeneration but also pain, the microvascular response and bacteriology. The effects of topical zinc sulfate were studied to articulate the methodologies in this double-blind trial. One epidermal suction blister (10 mm) was induced on each buttock in 30 healthy volunteers (15 females:15 males) and deroofed on day 0. The wounds were randomized to daily treatment with 1.4% zinc sulfate shower gel (n = 20), placebo (n = 20) or control (n = 20). Digital photography coupled with planimetry, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement and optical coherence tomography (OCT) was benchmarked to the gold standard of histology of 60 full-thickness wound biopsies on day 4. Pain increased after application of the shower gels. Microvessel density, determined from OCT images, increased from day 0 to day 2 in the three groups but increased more with the placebo than with the zinc shower gel (p = 0.003) or the control treatment (p = 0.002) and correlated (rS = 0.313, p = 0.015) with the inflammatory response on day 4, as determined by histology. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were more common in wounds compared with skin (p = 0.002) and was reduced (p = 0.030) with zinc sulfate treatment. Planimetric analysis of digital wound images was not biased (p = 0.234) compared with histology, and TEWL measurements showed no correlation (rS = 0.052, p = 0.691) with epithelialization. Neoepidermal formation, determined by histology, did not differ (p = 0.290) among the groups. Zinc sulfate reduced (p = 0.031) the release of lactate dehydrogenase from cultured gel-treated keratinocytes isolated from the blister roofs. Therefore, combination of the standardized suction-blister wound model with noninvasive planimetry and OCT is a useful tool for assessing wound therapies. Zinc sulfate transiently dampened inflammation and reduced bacterial growth.

U2 - 10.1111/wrr.12605

DO - 10.1111/wrr.12605

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29316016

AN - SCOPUS:85042064156

VL - 25

SP - 984

EP - 993

JO - Wound Repair and Regeneration

JF - Wound Repair and Regeneration

SN - 1067-1927

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 196438853