N.M. Petersen og Alessandro Manzoni. En komparativ analyse af sprogteori og sprogpolitik.
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
N.M. Petersen og Alessandro Manzoni. En komparativ analyse af sprogteori og sprogpolitik. / Jensen, Viggo Bank.
Filologen N.M. Petersen - grundlægger og fornyer. red. / Frans Gregersen; Anne Mette Hansen; Viggo Bank Jensen. Copenhagen : Selskab for Nordisk Filologi, 2014. s. 139-176.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - N.M. Petersen og Alessandro Manzoni. En komparativ analyse af sprogteori og sprogpolitik.
AU - Jensen, Viggo Bank
N1 - foreslået til BFI
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The focus in this article is a comparison between two linguists in the 19th century, the Italian A. Manzoni (1785-1873) and the Dane N.M. Petersen (1791-1862). They both understand language as a social issue and both use the school system as a means in their language policy. Nonetheless their conclusions differ in many ways. The article treats their language theories and language-planning proposals.It is concluded: a) that Manzoni and Petersen diverge in three dimensions. Manzoni has a synchronic approach, focuses on spoken language and argues for a centralized anti-Koine solution, i.e. modern Florentine as the Italian standard language, while Petersen has a historical, diachronic approach, focuses on written language and argues for a Koine, i.e. a Nordic common language, b) that the national premises for their language policies are very different, c) that the comparative perspective sheds new light on the language discussions in the two countries.
AB - The focus in this article is a comparison between two linguists in the 19th century, the Italian A. Manzoni (1785-1873) and the Dane N.M. Petersen (1791-1862). They both understand language as a social issue and both use the school system as a means in their language policy. Nonetheless their conclusions differ in many ways. The article treats their language theories and language-planning proposals.It is concluded: a) that Manzoni and Petersen diverge in three dimensions. Manzoni has a synchronic approach, focuses on spoken language and argues for a centralized anti-Koine solution, i.e. modern Florentine as the Italian standard language, while Petersen has a historical, diachronic approach, focuses on written language and argues for a Koine, i.e. a Nordic common language, b) that the national premises for their language policies are very different, c) that the comparative perspective sheds new light on the language discussions in the two countries.
M3 - Bidrag til bog/antologi
SN - 978-87-89641-15-7
SP - 139
EP - 176
BT - Filologen N.M. Petersen - grundlægger og fornyer
A2 - Gregersen, Frans
A2 - Hansen, Anne Mette
A2 - Jensen, Viggo Bank
PB - Selskab for Nordisk Filologi
CY - Copenhagen
ER -
ID: 101584472