Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt: Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt : Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models. / Bellemare, Charles; Sebald, Alexander Christopher; Strobel, Martin.

Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2010.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Bellemare, C, Sebald, AC & Strobel, M 2010 'Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt: Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models' Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

APA

Bellemare, C., Sebald, A. C., & Strobel, M. (2010). Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt: Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

Bellemare C, Sebald AC, Strobel M. Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt: Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2010.

Author

Bellemare, Charles ; Sebald, Alexander Christopher ; Strobel, Martin. / Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt : Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2010.

Bibtex

@techreport{dd51d7b0251a11df8ed1000ea68e967b,
title = "Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt: Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models",
abstract = "We estimate structural models of guilt aversion to measure the population level of willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid feeling guilt by letting down another player. We compare estimates of WTP under the assumption that higher-order beliefs are in equilibrium (i.e. consistent with the choice distribution) with models estimated using stated beliefs which relax the equilibrium requirement. We estimate WTP in the later case by allowing stated beliefs to be correlated with guilt aversion, thus controlling for a possible source of a consensus effect. All models are estimated using data from an experiment of proposal and response conducted with a large and representative sample of the Dutch population. Our range of estimates suggests that responders are willing to pay between 0.40 and 0.80 Euro to avoid letting down proposers by 1 Euro. Furthermore, we find that WTP estimated using stated beliefs is substantially overestimated (by a factor of two) when correlation between preferences and beliefs is not controlled for. Finally, we find no evidence that WTP is significantly related to the observable socio-economic characteristics of players.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, guilt aversion, willingness to pay",
author = "Charles Bellemare and Sebald, {Alexander Christopher} and Martin Strobel",
note = "JEL classification: C93, D63, D84",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt

T2 - Estimation using Equilibrium and Stated Belief Models

AU - Bellemare, Charles

AU - Sebald, Alexander Christopher

AU - Strobel, Martin

N1 - JEL classification: C93, D63, D84

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - We estimate structural models of guilt aversion to measure the population level of willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid feeling guilt by letting down another player. We compare estimates of WTP under the assumption that higher-order beliefs are in equilibrium (i.e. consistent with the choice distribution) with models estimated using stated beliefs which relax the equilibrium requirement. We estimate WTP in the later case by allowing stated beliefs to be correlated with guilt aversion, thus controlling for a possible source of a consensus effect. All models are estimated using data from an experiment of proposal and response conducted with a large and representative sample of the Dutch population. Our range of estimates suggests that responders are willing to pay between 0.40 and 0.80 Euro to avoid letting down proposers by 1 Euro. Furthermore, we find that WTP estimated using stated beliefs is substantially overestimated (by a factor of two) when correlation between preferences and beliefs is not controlled for. Finally, we find no evidence that WTP is significantly related to the observable socio-economic characteristics of players.

AB - We estimate structural models of guilt aversion to measure the population level of willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid feeling guilt by letting down another player. We compare estimates of WTP under the assumption that higher-order beliefs are in equilibrium (i.e. consistent with the choice distribution) with models estimated using stated beliefs which relax the equilibrium requirement. We estimate WTP in the later case by allowing stated beliefs to be correlated with guilt aversion, thus controlling for a possible source of a consensus effect. All models are estimated using data from an experiment of proposal and response conducted with a large and representative sample of the Dutch population. Our range of estimates suggests that responders are willing to pay between 0.40 and 0.80 Euro to avoid letting down proposers by 1 Euro. Furthermore, we find that WTP estimated using stated beliefs is substantially overestimated (by a factor of two) when correlation between preferences and beliefs is not controlled for. Finally, we find no evidence that WTP is significantly related to the observable socio-economic characteristics of players.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - guilt aversion

KW - willingness to pay

M3 - Working paper

BT - Measuring the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Guilt

PB - Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 18314924