Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure : patient selection and outcomes. / Gustafsson, Finn; Rogers, Joseph G.

I: European Journal of Heart Failure, Bind 19, Nr. 5, 05.2017, s. 595-602.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gustafsson, F & Rogers, JG 2017, 'Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes', European Journal of Heart Failure, bind 19, nr. 5, s. 595-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.779

APA

Gustafsson, F., & Rogers, J. G. (2017). Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes. European Journal of Heart Failure, 19(5), 595-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.779

Vancouver

Gustafsson F, Rogers JG. Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2017 maj;19(5):595-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.779

Author

Gustafsson, Finn ; Rogers, Joseph G. / Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure : patient selection and outcomes. I: European Journal of Heart Failure. 2017 ; Bind 19, Nr. 5. s. 595-602.

Bibtex

@article{a328211f333a41aa8fdb80df84ad3c97,
title = "Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes",
abstract = "Despite improvements in pharmacological therapy and pacing, prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF) remains poor, with a 1-year mortality of 25-50%. While heart transplantation provides excellent survival and quality of life for eligible patients, only a few can be offered this treatment due to shortage of donor organs. Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has improved considerably, and the currently used continuous flow devices may last >10 years in a patient. LVADs are being used increasingly both as bridge-to-transplantation and as destination therapy. Current studies report 1- and 2-year survival after LVAD implantation of 80% and 70%, respectively. Outcome after LVAD implantation in stable patients is superior to that of 'crash and burn' patients or patients sliding on inotropes, favouring early referral and implantation. This review summarizes factors to consider when deciding on LVAD implantation such as age, co-morbidity, and cardiac pathophysiology. Complications to LVAD therapy are reviewed. It is concluded that while complications with LVAD therapy are not uncommon, most are manageable, and current outcomes clearly justify use of LVADs in advanced HF.",
keywords = "Echocardiography, Heart Failure/diagnosis, Heart-Assist Devices, Humans, Patient Selection, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Finn Gustafsson and Rogers, {Joseph G}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure {\textcopyright} 2017 European Society of Cardiology.",
year = "2017",
month = may,
doi = "10.1002/ejhf.779",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "595--602",
journal = "European Journal of Heart Failure",
issn = "1567-4215",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure

T2 - patient selection and outcomes

AU - Gustafsson, Finn

AU - Rogers, Joseph G

N1 - © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2017 European Society of Cardiology.

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - Despite improvements in pharmacological therapy and pacing, prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF) remains poor, with a 1-year mortality of 25-50%. While heart transplantation provides excellent survival and quality of life for eligible patients, only a few can be offered this treatment due to shortage of donor organs. Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has improved considerably, and the currently used continuous flow devices may last >10 years in a patient. LVADs are being used increasingly both as bridge-to-transplantation and as destination therapy. Current studies report 1- and 2-year survival after LVAD implantation of 80% and 70%, respectively. Outcome after LVAD implantation in stable patients is superior to that of 'crash and burn' patients or patients sliding on inotropes, favouring early referral and implantation. This review summarizes factors to consider when deciding on LVAD implantation such as age, co-morbidity, and cardiac pathophysiology. Complications to LVAD therapy are reviewed. It is concluded that while complications with LVAD therapy are not uncommon, most are manageable, and current outcomes clearly justify use of LVADs in advanced HF.

AB - Despite improvements in pharmacological therapy and pacing, prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF) remains poor, with a 1-year mortality of 25-50%. While heart transplantation provides excellent survival and quality of life for eligible patients, only a few can be offered this treatment due to shortage of donor organs. Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has improved considerably, and the currently used continuous flow devices may last >10 years in a patient. LVADs are being used increasingly both as bridge-to-transplantation and as destination therapy. Current studies report 1- and 2-year survival after LVAD implantation of 80% and 70%, respectively. Outcome after LVAD implantation in stable patients is superior to that of 'crash and burn' patients or patients sliding on inotropes, favouring early referral and implantation. This review summarizes factors to consider when deciding on LVAD implantation such as age, co-morbidity, and cardiac pathophysiology. Complications to LVAD therapy are reviewed. It is concluded that while complications with LVAD therapy are not uncommon, most are manageable, and current outcomes clearly justify use of LVADs in advanced HF.

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Heart Failure/diagnosis

KW - Heart-Assist Devices

KW - Humans

KW - Patient Selection

KW - Severity of Illness Index

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.779

DO - 10.1002/ejhf.779

M3 - Review

C2 - 28198133

VL - 19

SP - 595

EP - 602

JO - European Journal of Heart Failure

JF - European Journal of Heart Failure

SN - 1567-4215

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 193895631