Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings. / Sengupta, K.; Ersbøll, A. K.; Christensen, L. B.; Mortensen, L. H.; Andersen, I.

I: JDR Clinical and Translational Research, Bind 6, Nr. 4, 2021, s. 448-457.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sengupta, K, Ersbøll, AK, Christensen, LB, Mortensen, LH & Andersen, I 2021, 'Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings', JDR Clinical and Translational Research, bind 6, nr. 4, s. 448-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084420951147

APA

Sengupta, K., Ersbøll, A. K., Christensen, L. B., Mortensen, L. H., & Andersen, I. (2021). Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings. JDR Clinical and Translational Research, 6(4), 448-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084420951147

Vancouver

Sengupta K, Ersbøll AK, Christensen LB, Mortensen LH, Andersen I. Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings. JDR Clinical and Translational Research. 2021;6(4):448-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084420951147

Author

Sengupta, K. ; Ersbøll, A. K. ; Christensen, L. B. ; Mortensen, L. H. ; Andersen, I. / Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings. I: JDR Clinical and Translational Research. 2021 ; Bind 6, Nr. 4. s. 448-457.

Bibtex

@article{c4e9835b97c14b0a99a14adb32e5a2d1,
title = "Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings",
abstract = "Introduction: Social and family conditions are likely of great importance to dental health; however, limited evidence of familial aggregation of caries among adolescent siblings exists. Moreover, social and family-level factors have never been evaluated as isolated caries predictors at the individual level. Objectives: The objectives were to evaluate socioeconomic patterning of caries among siblings, assess sibling-specific aggregation of caries within families, and examine if such aggregation differed by parental socioeconomic position (SEP). We also evaluated the discriminant ability of sibling caries, SEP, and other social and familial factors in predicting caries in cosiblings. Methods: This nationwide register-based study included all 15-y-olds in Denmark in 2003 (index siblings) and their biological siblings born within ±3 y (cosiblings). Clinical and sociodemographic data for each subject were compiled from Danish national dental, social, and population registers. Caries was measured by the decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces (DMFS) index. Predictors included SEP (parental education, income, and occupational social class), gender, birth order, immigration status, and household type. Adjusted SEP-caries associations were estimated using negative binomial regression. Familial aggregation was evaluated using adjusted pairwise odds ratios from alternating logistic regressions. Caries prediction was based on classification and regression tree (CART) analyses. Results: The study included 23,847 sibling pairs (n = 47,694). Socioeconomic patterning of caries was similar among the index and cosiblings with significant graded SEP-caries associations. Significant sibling-specific aggregation of caries was observed; cosiblings of caries-affected index siblings had odds of having caries 3.9 times (95% confidence interval: 3.65–4.18) as high as that of cosiblings with caries-free index siblings. This sibling similarity was stronger in socioeconomically disadvantaged families (adjusted pairwise odds ratios: 3.08–5.47). CART revealed index sibling caries as the single most important caries predictor, with caries predicted in ≥84% of cosiblings of adolescents with ≥3 carious tooth surfaces. Conclusions: Caries in a sibling should prompt preventive family-based approaches targeting cosiblings. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study revealed significant socioeconomic patterning of caries in adolescent siblings. Prediction modeling indicated that the single most important caries predictor among cosiblings was index sibling caries. Information on sibling caries level should be routinely combined with clinical evaluation to identify children at risk. Moreover, information on social and family conditions should be used to target prevention and health promotion at the school or municipal level. These approaches could possibly contribute to reducing the existing caries inequalities.",
keywords = "classification, decision trees, DMF index, family, projections and predictions, social determinants of health",
author = "K. Sengupta and Ersb{\o}ll, {A. K.} and Christensen, {L. B.} and Mortensen, {L. H.} and I. Andersen",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1177/2380084420951147",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "448--457",
journal = "JDR Clinical and Translational Research",
issn = "2380-0844",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inequality, Familial Aggregation, and Risk Prediction of Caries in Siblings

AU - Sengupta, K.

AU - Ersbøll, A. K.

AU - Christensen, L. B.

AU - Mortensen, L. H.

AU - Andersen, I.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Introduction: Social and family conditions are likely of great importance to dental health; however, limited evidence of familial aggregation of caries among adolescent siblings exists. Moreover, social and family-level factors have never been evaluated as isolated caries predictors at the individual level. Objectives: The objectives were to evaluate socioeconomic patterning of caries among siblings, assess sibling-specific aggregation of caries within families, and examine if such aggregation differed by parental socioeconomic position (SEP). We also evaluated the discriminant ability of sibling caries, SEP, and other social and familial factors in predicting caries in cosiblings. Methods: This nationwide register-based study included all 15-y-olds in Denmark in 2003 (index siblings) and their biological siblings born within ±3 y (cosiblings). Clinical and sociodemographic data for each subject were compiled from Danish national dental, social, and population registers. Caries was measured by the decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces (DMFS) index. Predictors included SEP (parental education, income, and occupational social class), gender, birth order, immigration status, and household type. Adjusted SEP-caries associations were estimated using negative binomial regression. Familial aggregation was evaluated using adjusted pairwise odds ratios from alternating logistic regressions. Caries prediction was based on classification and regression tree (CART) analyses. Results: The study included 23,847 sibling pairs (n = 47,694). Socioeconomic patterning of caries was similar among the index and cosiblings with significant graded SEP-caries associations. Significant sibling-specific aggregation of caries was observed; cosiblings of caries-affected index siblings had odds of having caries 3.9 times (95% confidence interval: 3.65–4.18) as high as that of cosiblings with caries-free index siblings. This sibling similarity was stronger in socioeconomically disadvantaged families (adjusted pairwise odds ratios: 3.08–5.47). CART revealed index sibling caries as the single most important caries predictor, with caries predicted in ≥84% of cosiblings of adolescents with ≥3 carious tooth surfaces. Conclusions: Caries in a sibling should prompt preventive family-based approaches targeting cosiblings. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study revealed significant socioeconomic patterning of caries in adolescent siblings. Prediction modeling indicated that the single most important caries predictor among cosiblings was index sibling caries. Information on sibling caries level should be routinely combined with clinical evaluation to identify children at risk. Moreover, information on social and family conditions should be used to target prevention and health promotion at the school or municipal level. These approaches could possibly contribute to reducing the existing caries inequalities.

AB - Introduction: Social and family conditions are likely of great importance to dental health; however, limited evidence of familial aggregation of caries among adolescent siblings exists. Moreover, social and family-level factors have never been evaluated as isolated caries predictors at the individual level. Objectives: The objectives were to evaluate socioeconomic patterning of caries among siblings, assess sibling-specific aggregation of caries within families, and examine if such aggregation differed by parental socioeconomic position (SEP). We also evaluated the discriminant ability of sibling caries, SEP, and other social and familial factors in predicting caries in cosiblings. Methods: This nationwide register-based study included all 15-y-olds in Denmark in 2003 (index siblings) and their biological siblings born within ±3 y (cosiblings). Clinical and sociodemographic data for each subject were compiled from Danish national dental, social, and population registers. Caries was measured by the decayed, missing, and filled tooth surfaces (DMFS) index. Predictors included SEP (parental education, income, and occupational social class), gender, birth order, immigration status, and household type. Adjusted SEP-caries associations were estimated using negative binomial regression. Familial aggregation was evaluated using adjusted pairwise odds ratios from alternating logistic regressions. Caries prediction was based on classification and regression tree (CART) analyses. Results: The study included 23,847 sibling pairs (n = 47,694). Socioeconomic patterning of caries was similar among the index and cosiblings with significant graded SEP-caries associations. Significant sibling-specific aggregation of caries was observed; cosiblings of caries-affected index siblings had odds of having caries 3.9 times (95% confidence interval: 3.65–4.18) as high as that of cosiblings with caries-free index siblings. This sibling similarity was stronger in socioeconomically disadvantaged families (adjusted pairwise odds ratios: 3.08–5.47). CART revealed index sibling caries as the single most important caries predictor, with caries predicted in ≥84% of cosiblings of adolescents with ≥3 carious tooth surfaces. Conclusions: Caries in a sibling should prompt preventive family-based approaches targeting cosiblings. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study revealed significant socioeconomic patterning of caries in adolescent siblings. Prediction modeling indicated that the single most important caries predictor among cosiblings was index sibling caries. Information on sibling caries level should be routinely combined with clinical evaluation to identify children at risk. Moreover, information on social and family conditions should be used to target prevention and health promotion at the school or municipal level. These approaches could possibly contribute to reducing the existing caries inequalities.

KW - classification

KW - decision trees

KW - DMF index

KW - family

KW - projections and predictions

KW - social determinants of health

U2 - 10.1177/2380084420951147

DO - 10.1177/2380084420951147

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32816616

AN - SCOPUS:85089658316

VL - 6

SP - 448

EP - 457

JO - JDR Clinical and Translational Research

JF - JDR Clinical and Translational Research

SN - 2380-0844

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 249157384