Globalization Conflict in International Assemblies: Cleavage Formation beyond the State?
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Globalization Conflict in International Assemblies : Cleavage Formation beyond the State? / de Wilde, Pieter; Junk, Wiebke Marie; Palmtag, Tabea.
The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. red. / Pieter De Wilde; Ruud Koopmans; Wolfgang Merkel; Oliver Strijbis; Michael Zürn. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2019. s. 144-172.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Globalization Conflict in International Assemblies
T2 - Cleavage Formation beyond the State?
AU - de Wilde, Pieter
AU - Junk, Wiebke Marie
AU - Palmtag, Tabea
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - analyzes globalization-related conflict in the UNGA and the European Parliament. These two ‘strong publics’ feature debates on issues related to the permeability of borders and are directly tied to important centers of decision-making in global governance. The findings show a powerful cosmopolitan presence in both assemblies. The EP also features more communitarian counter voices. An indepth analysis of the partisan nature of debate in the EP and the difference between directly elected Members of the EP and appointed European Commissioners lends strength to the hypothesis that electoral accountability strengthens the presence of communitarian voice in supranational arenas. Direct elections and proportional representation appears to increase the presence of communitarians in global governance. This finding implies that cosmopolitan democrats face a difficult trade-off. They can democratize global governance, but it will likely come at the price of less cosmopolitan policies made in international institutions. Alternatively, they can pursue cosmopolitan policies, but only if they limit the democratic accountability of key global governance institutions.
AB - analyzes globalization-related conflict in the UNGA and the European Parliament. These two ‘strong publics’ feature debates on issues related to the permeability of borders and are directly tied to important centers of decision-making in global governance. The findings show a powerful cosmopolitan presence in both assemblies. The EP also features more communitarian counter voices. An indepth analysis of the partisan nature of debate in the EP and the difference between directly elected Members of the EP and appointed European Commissioners lends strength to the hypothesis that electoral accountability strengthens the presence of communitarian voice in supranational arenas. Direct elections and proportional representation appears to increase the presence of communitarians in global governance. This finding implies that cosmopolitan democrats face a difficult trade-off. They can democratize global governance, but it will likely come at the price of less cosmopolitan policies made in international institutions. Alternatively, they can pursue cosmopolitan policies, but only if they limit the democratic accountability of key global governance institutions.
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652698
DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652698
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9781108483773
SP - 144
EP - 172
BT - The Struggle Over Borders
A2 - De Wilde, Pieter
A2 - Koopmans, Ruud
A2 - Merkel, Wolfgang
A2 - Strijbis, Oliver
A2 - Zürn, Michael
PB - Cambridge University Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -
ID: 234635355