General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer. / Arreskov, Anne Beiter; Lindell, Johanna Falby; Davidsen, Annette Sofie.

I: Journal of Health Psychology, Bind 27, Nr. 10, 2022, s. 2261-2275.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Arreskov, AB, Lindell, JF & Davidsen, AS 2022, 'General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer', Journal of Health Psychology, bind 27, nr. 10, s. 2261-2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211025593

APA

Arreskov, A. B., Lindell, J. F., & Davidsen, A. S. (2022). General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(10), 2261-2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211025593

Vancouver

Arreskov AB, Lindell JF, Davidsen AS. General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer. Journal of Health Psychology. 2022;27(10):2261-2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211025593

Author

Arreskov, Anne Beiter ; Lindell, Johanna Falby ; Davidsen, Annette Sofie. / General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer. I: Journal of Health Psychology. 2022 ; Bind 27, Nr. 10. s. 2261-2275.

Bibtex

@article{188ff506995b49fbafac8a1f8351acae,

title = "General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer",

abstract = "We investigated general practitioners{\textquoteright} (GPs{\textquoteright}) responses to patients{\textquoteright} concerns in chronic care consultations. Video recordings of 14 consultations were analyzed with conversation analysis. We found two categories of responses: exiting and exploring the patient{\textquoteright}s concerns. Most GPs exited the concern by interrupting the patient, acknowledging the concern but then referring back to the progression of the consultation, or affiliating with the concern without exploring it. Only a few raised concerns were explored, and then most often the somatic rather than the emotional aspects of them. The findings point to the risk of missing patients{\textquoteright} voiced concerns in consultations with a fixed agenda.",

keywords = "Chronic care consultation, concern, conversation analysis, general practitioner, lifeworld",

author = "Arreskov, {Anne Beiter} and Lindell, {Johanna Falby} and Davidsen, {Annette Sofie}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1177/13591053211025593",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "2261--2275",

journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",

issn = "1359-1053",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - General practitioner responses to concerns in chronic care consultations for patients with a history of cancer

AU - Arreskov, Anne Beiter

AU - Lindell, Johanna Falby

AU - Davidsen, Annette Sofie

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - We investigated general practitioners’ (GPs’) responses to patients’ concerns in chronic care consultations. Video recordings of 14 consultations were analyzed with conversation analysis. We found two categories of responses: exiting and exploring the patient’s concerns. Most GPs exited the concern by interrupting the patient, acknowledging the concern but then referring back to the progression of the consultation, or affiliating with the concern without exploring it. Only a few raised concerns were explored, and then most often the somatic rather than the emotional aspects of them. The findings point to the risk of missing patients’ voiced concerns in consultations with a fixed agenda.

AB - We investigated general practitioners’ (GPs’) responses to patients’ concerns in chronic care consultations. Video recordings of 14 consultations were analyzed with conversation analysis. We found two categories of responses: exiting and exploring the patient’s concerns. Most GPs exited the concern by interrupting the patient, acknowledging the concern but then referring back to the progression of the consultation, or affiliating with the concern without exploring it. Only a few raised concerns were explored, and then most often the somatic rather than the emotional aspects of them. The findings point to the risk of missing patients’ voiced concerns in consultations with a fixed agenda.

KW - Chronic care consultation

KW - concern

KW - conversation analysis

KW - general practitioner

KW - lifeworld

U2 - 10.1177/13591053211025593

DO - 10.1177/13591053211025593

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34219544

AN - SCOPUS:85109138202

VL - 27

SP - 2261

EP - 2275

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 274912624