Evolving biosimilar clinical requirements: A qualitative interview study with industry experts and European national medicines agency regulators
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Evolving biosimilar clinical requirements: A qualitative interview study with industry experts and European national medicines agency regulators. / Druedahl, Louise C.; Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia; van de Weert, Marco; De Bruin, Marie Louise (Marieke); Hoogland, Hans; Minssen, Timo; Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna.
I: BioDrugs, Bind 35, 2021, s. 351-361.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolving biosimilar clinical requirements: A qualitative interview study with industry experts and European national medicines agency regulators
AU - Druedahl, Louise C.
AU - Kälvemark Sporrong, Sofia
AU - van de Weert, Marco
AU - De Bruin, Marie Louise (Marieke)
AU - Hoogland, Hans
AU - Minssen, Timo
AU - Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: A biosimilar is a biological medicine highly similar to another already approved biological medicine (reference product). The availability of biosimilars promotes competition and subsequently lower prices. Changing the current biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements may lead to lower biosimilar development costs that potentially could increase patients’ access to biologics. Objective: The aim was to determine the perceptions of industry and medicines agency regulators regarding the value, necessity, and future developments of the European biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements for establishing biosimilarity. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight European national medicines agency regulators and 17 pharmaceutical company employees or consultants with experience in biologics between September 2018 and August 2019. Data were subjected to content analysis. Results: In general, the participants expected that clinical comparability trial requirements will continue to be reduced, in particular based on advancements in analytical testing and knowledge generated from prior biosimilar approvals. However, there are also competing issues at play, such as competition, physician’s trust, and ethical considerations. Participants also reported that any new initiative to reduce or waive biosimilar clinical requirements needs to be scientifcally sound and could potentially lower biosimilar development costs. Conclusion: The main fndings are that biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements are likely to change in the near future. Clarity is needed on how to ensure adequate correlation between physicochemical data, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, and the drugs’ performance in the clinic, as well as how to continue sufcient immunogenicity assessment. Obtaining this clarity can facilitate regulatory assessment of the next biosimilars.
AB - Background: A biosimilar is a biological medicine highly similar to another already approved biological medicine (reference product). The availability of biosimilars promotes competition and subsequently lower prices. Changing the current biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements may lead to lower biosimilar development costs that potentially could increase patients’ access to biologics. Objective: The aim was to determine the perceptions of industry and medicines agency regulators regarding the value, necessity, and future developments of the European biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements for establishing biosimilarity. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight European national medicines agency regulators and 17 pharmaceutical company employees or consultants with experience in biologics between September 2018 and August 2019. Data were subjected to content analysis. Results: In general, the participants expected that clinical comparability trial requirements will continue to be reduced, in particular based on advancements in analytical testing and knowledge generated from prior biosimilar approvals. However, there are also competing issues at play, such as competition, physician’s trust, and ethical considerations. Participants also reported that any new initiative to reduce or waive biosimilar clinical requirements needs to be scientifcally sound and could potentially lower biosimilar development costs. Conclusion: The main fndings are that biosimilar clinical comparability trial requirements are likely to change in the near future. Clarity is needed on how to ensure adequate correlation between physicochemical data, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, and the drugs’ performance in the clinic, as well as how to continue sufcient immunogenicity assessment. Obtaining this clarity can facilitate regulatory assessment of the next biosimilars.
U2 - 10.1007/s40259-021-00478-7
DO - 10.1007/s40259-021-00478-7
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33830478
VL - 35
SP - 351
EP - 361
JO - BioDrugs
JF - BioDrugs
SN - 1173-8804
ER -
ID: 258374041