Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20. / Ali, Nafisa; Sørensen, Mette S; Sørensen, Torben L; Mortzos, Panteleimon.

I: Clinical Ophthalmology (Online), Bind 10, 2016, s. 65-9.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ali, N, Sørensen, MS, Sørensen, TL & Mortzos, P 2016, 'Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20', Clinical Ophthalmology (Online), bind 10, s. 65-9. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90844

APA

Ali, N., Sørensen, M. S., Sørensen, T. L., & Mortzos, P. (2016). Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20. Clinical Ophthalmology (Online), 10, 65-9. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90844

Vancouver

Ali N, Sørensen MS, Sørensen TL, Mortzos P. Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20. Clinical Ophthalmology (Online). 2016;10:65-9. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S90844

Author

Ali, Nafisa ; Sørensen, Mette S ; Sørensen, Torben L ; Mortzos, Panteleimon. / Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20. I: Clinical Ophthalmology (Online). 2016 ; Bind 10. s. 65-9.

Bibtex

@article{4097ca7f79a8448d992ce9fcd107add7,
title = "Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with strabismus is important in evaluating the clinical benefits of strabismus treatment. The purpose of this study was to translate the Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS-20) into Danish and evaluate its reliability and validity in adult patients with strabismus in Denmark.METHODS: The AS-20 was translated into Danish in accordance with standard international adopted methods. We presented the questionnaire to 64 adults with strabismus and to 13 non-strabismic adult controls. We tested the reliability of the Danish version by reassuring test-retest reliability, estimated the internal consistency, and analyzed the validity (discriminatory power) of the questionnaire by comparing patient scores with scores from control individuals.RESULTS: The Danish AS-20 produced high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α values) for both subscales (psychosocial: 0.95 and functional: 0.85). We found good discriminatory power of the AS-20. The patients scored significantly lower not only on AS-20 composite score (median =63, interquartile range [IQR] =44-79) compared to healthy individuals (median =98, IQR =93-100) (P<0.0001) but also on all individual questions in both subscales (psychosocial: 1-10 and functional: 11-20).CONCLUSION: The Danish version of AS-20 shows high reliability and validity, and in our opinion, AS-20 is therefore a suitable instrument for evaluating self-perceived psychosocial and functional influence of strabismus.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Nafisa Ali and S{\o}rensen, {Mette S} and S{\o}rensen, {Torben L} and Panteleimon Mortzos",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.2147/OPTH.S90844",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "65--9",
journal = "Clinical Ophthalmology (Online)",
issn = "1177-5483",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and validity of the Danish version of the Adult Strabismus Questionnaire AS-20

AU - Ali, Nafisa

AU - Sørensen, Mette S

AU - Sørensen, Torben L

AU - Mortzos, Panteleimon

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - PURPOSE: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with strabismus is important in evaluating the clinical benefits of strabismus treatment. The purpose of this study was to translate the Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS-20) into Danish and evaluate its reliability and validity in adult patients with strabismus in Denmark.METHODS: The AS-20 was translated into Danish in accordance with standard international adopted methods. We presented the questionnaire to 64 adults with strabismus and to 13 non-strabismic adult controls. We tested the reliability of the Danish version by reassuring test-retest reliability, estimated the internal consistency, and analyzed the validity (discriminatory power) of the questionnaire by comparing patient scores with scores from control individuals.RESULTS: The Danish AS-20 produced high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α values) for both subscales (psychosocial: 0.95 and functional: 0.85). We found good discriminatory power of the AS-20. The patients scored significantly lower not only on AS-20 composite score (median =63, interquartile range [IQR] =44-79) compared to healthy individuals (median =98, IQR =93-100) (P<0.0001) but also on all individual questions in both subscales (psychosocial: 1-10 and functional: 11-20).CONCLUSION: The Danish version of AS-20 shows high reliability and validity, and in our opinion, AS-20 is therefore a suitable instrument for evaluating self-perceived psychosocial and functional influence of strabismus.

AB - PURPOSE: Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with strabismus is important in evaluating the clinical benefits of strabismus treatment. The purpose of this study was to translate the Adult Strabismus Quality of Life Questionnaire (AS-20) into Danish and evaluate its reliability and validity in adult patients with strabismus in Denmark.METHODS: The AS-20 was translated into Danish in accordance with standard international adopted methods. We presented the questionnaire to 64 adults with strabismus and to 13 non-strabismic adult controls. We tested the reliability of the Danish version by reassuring test-retest reliability, estimated the internal consistency, and analyzed the validity (discriminatory power) of the questionnaire by comparing patient scores with scores from control individuals.RESULTS: The Danish AS-20 produced high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α values) for both subscales (psychosocial: 0.95 and functional: 0.85). We found good discriminatory power of the AS-20. The patients scored significantly lower not only on AS-20 composite score (median =63, interquartile range [IQR] =44-79) compared to healthy individuals (median =98, IQR =93-100) (P<0.0001) but also on all individual questions in both subscales (psychosocial: 1-10 and functional: 11-20).CONCLUSION: The Danish version of AS-20 shows high reliability and validity, and in our opinion, AS-20 is therefore a suitable instrument for evaluating self-perceived psychosocial and functional influence of strabismus.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.2147/OPTH.S90844

DO - 10.2147/OPTH.S90844

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26770057

VL - 10

SP - 65

EP - 69

JO - Clinical Ophthalmology (Online)

JF - Clinical Ophthalmology (Online)

SN - 1177-5483

ER -

ID: 167358806