Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study. / Overbeck, Gritt; Brostrøm Kousgaard, Marius; Davidsen, Annette Sofie.

I: Journal of Interprofessional Care, Bind 33, Nr. 5, 2019, s. 519-527.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Overbeck, G, Brostrøm Kousgaard, M & Davidsen, AS 2019, 'Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study', Journal of Interprofessional Care, bind 33, nr. 5, s. 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538109

APA

Overbeck, G., Brostrøm Kousgaard, M., & Davidsen, A. S. (2019). Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(5), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538109

Vancouver

Overbeck G, Brostrøm Kousgaard M, Davidsen AS. Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2019;33(5):519-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538109

Author

Overbeck, Gritt ; Brostrøm Kousgaard, Marius ; Davidsen, Annette Sofie. / Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study. I: Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2019 ; Bind 33, Nr. 5. s. 519-527.

Bibtex

@article{00f12ef94a4e4539a112a7063b62945e,
title = "Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study",
abstract = "One of the key components in collaborative care (CC) for anxiety and depression between general practitioners (GPs) and psychiatry is 'enhanced interprofessional communication'. However, the literature contains few detailed descriptions of the interprofessional roles and specific collaborative behaviours that are required to enhance communication. Using semi-structured interviews and observations, this study explores how interprofessional communication was enacted in a CC intervention in Denmark. Analysis was by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and interaction analysis. In the intervention the components of the enhanced communication were a) weekly meetings between care managers (CMs) and GPs and b) group supervision of GPs by a psychiatrist. This study showed that the meetings between CMs and GPs were enacted very differently across clinics, with communication ranging from monological 'giving report'-style to more dialogical 'peer-discussion'-style with development of new shared knowledge. The type of communication depended on the GP's professional style. The supervision element was not perceived as being meaningful and GPs reacted by non-attendance and non-response. Engagement of the GPs in a shared process requires a more dialogical model. However, the choice depends on whether a referral or a collaborative model is aimed at. A dialogical model would demand the teaching and guidance of the professionals.",
author = "Gritt Overbeck and {Brostr{\o}m Kousgaard}, Marius and Davidsen, {Annette Sofie}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/13561820.2018.1538109",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "519--527",
journal = "Journal of Interprofessional Care",
issn = "1356-1820",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enactments and experiences of 'enhanced interprofessional communication' in collaborative care - a qualitative study

AU - Overbeck, Gritt

AU - Brostrøm Kousgaard, Marius

AU - Davidsen, Annette Sofie

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - One of the key components in collaborative care (CC) for anxiety and depression between general practitioners (GPs) and psychiatry is 'enhanced interprofessional communication'. However, the literature contains few detailed descriptions of the interprofessional roles and specific collaborative behaviours that are required to enhance communication. Using semi-structured interviews and observations, this study explores how interprofessional communication was enacted in a CC intervention in Denmark. Analysis was by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and interaction analysis. In the intervention the components of the enhanced communication were a) weekly meetings between care managers (CMs) and GPs and b) group supervision of GPs by a psychiatrist. This study showed that the meetings between CMs and GPs were enacted very differently across clinics, with communication ranging from monological 'giving report'-style to more dialogical 'peer-discussion'-style with development of new shared knowledge. The type of communication depended on the GP's professional style. The supervision element was not perceived as being meaningful and GPs reacted by non-attendance and non-response. Engagement of the GPs in a shared process requires a more dialogical model. However, the choice depends on whether a referral or a collaborative model is aimed at. A dialogical model would demand the teaching and guidance of the professionals.

AB - One of the key components in collaborative care (CC) for anxiety and depression between general practitioners (GPs) and psychiatry is 'enhanced interprofessional communication'. However, the literature contains few detailed descriptions of the interprofessional roles and specific collaborative behaviours that are required to enhance communication. Using semi-structured interviews and observations, this study explores how interprofessional communication was enacted in a CC intervention in Denmark. Analysis was by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and interaction analysis. In the intervention the components of the enhanced communication were a) weekly meetings between care managers (CMs) and GPs and b) group supervision of GPs by a psychiatrist. This study showed that the meetings between CMs and GPs were enacted very differently across clinics, with communication ranging from monological 'giving report'-style to more dialogical 'peer-discussion'-style with development of new shared knowledge. The type of communication depended on the GP's professional style. The supervision element was not perceived as being meaningful and GPs reacted by non-attendance and non-response. Engagement of the GPs in a shared process requires a more dialogical model. However, the choice depends on whether a referral or a collaborative model is aimed at. A dialogical model would demand the teaching and guidance of the professionals.

U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2018.1538109

DO - 10.1080/13561820.2018.1538109

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30358462

VL - 33

SP - 519

EP - 527

JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care

JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care

SN - 1356-1820

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 208848924