Electromagnetic source imaging in presurgical workup of patients with epilepsy: A prospective study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • e576.full

    Forlagets udgivne version, 764 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Lene Duez
  • Hatice Tankisi
  • Peter Orm Hansen
  • Per Sidenius
  • Anne Sabers
  • Pinborg, Lars Hageman
  • Martin Fabricius
  • György Rásonyi
  • Rubboli, Guido
  • Birthe Pedersen
  • Anne-Mette Leffers
  • Peter Uldall
  • Bo Jespersen
  • Jannick Brennum
  • Otto Mølby Henriksen
  • Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen
  • Sándor Beniczky

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of electromagnetic source imaging (EMSI) in presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy.

METHODS: We prospectively recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) simultaneously with EEG and performed EMSI, comprising electric source imaging, magnetic source imaging, and analysis of combined MEG-EEG datasets, using 2 different software packages. As reference standard for irritative zone (IZ) and seizure onset zone (SOZ), we used intracranial recordings and for localization accuracy, outcome 1 year after operation.

RESULTS: We included 141 consecutive patients. EMSI showed localized epileptiform discharges in 94 patients (67%). Most of the epileptiform discharge clusters (72%) were identified by both modalities, 15% only by EEG, and 14% only by MEG. Agreement was substantial between inverse solutions and moderate between software packages. EMSI provided new information that changed the management plan in 34% of the patients, and these changes were useful in 80%. Depending on the method, EMSI had a concordance of 53% to 89% with IZ and 35% to 73% with SOZ. Localization accuracy of EMSI was between 44% and 57%, which was not significantly different from MRI (49%-76%) and PET (54%-85%). Combined EMSI achieved significantly higher odds ratio compared to electric source imaging and magnetic source imaging.

CONCLUSION: EMSI has accuracy similar to established imaging methods and provides clinically useful, new information in 34% of the patients.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that EMSI had a concordance of 53%-89% and 35%-73% (depending on analysis) for the localization of epileptic focus as compared with intracranial recordings-IZ and SOZ, respectively.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftNeurology
Vol/bind92
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)e576-e586
ISSN0028-3878
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 224386306