Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial. / Ghaziani, Emma; Couppé, Christian; Siersma, Volkert; Søndergaard, Mette; Christensen, Hanne; Magnusson, S Peter.

I: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Bind 32, Nr. 10, 2018, s. 899-912.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ghaziani, E, Couppé, C, Siersma, V, Søndergaard, M, Christensen, H & Magnusson, SP 2018, 'Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial', Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, bind 32, nr. 10, s. 899-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318799496

APA

Ghaziani, E., Couppé, C., Siersma, V., Søndergaard, M., Christensen, H., & Magnusson, S. P. (2018). Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 32(10), 899-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318799496

Vancouver

Ghaziani E, Couppé C, Siersma V, Søndergaard M, Christensen H, Magnusson SP. Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2018;32(10):899-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968318799496

Author

Ghaziani, Emma ; Couppé, Christian ; Siersma, Volkert ; Søndergaard, Mette ; Christensen, Hanne ; Magnusson, S Peter. / Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke : A Randomized Controlled Trial. I: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2018 ; Bind 32, Nr. 10. s. 899-912.

Bibtex

@article{2724604b070f4d1d995370096e4aac0f,
title = "Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Arm paresis is present in 48% to 77% of acute stroke patients. Complete functional recovery is reported in only 12% to 34%. Although the arm recovery is most pronounced during the first 4 weeks poststroke, few studies examined the effect of upper extremity interventions during this period.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of electrical somatosensory stimulation (ESS) delivered during early stroke rehabilitation on the recovery of arm functioning.METHODS: A total of 102 patients with arm paresis were randomized to a high-dose or a low-dose ESS group within 7 days poststroke according to our sample size estimation. The high-dose group received 1-hour ESS to the paretic arm daily during hospitalization immediately followed by minimum 15-minute task-oriented arm training that was considered a component of the usual rehabilitation. The low-dose group received a placebo ESS followed by identical training. Primary outcome-Box and Block Test (BBT); secondary outcomes-Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), grip strength, pinch strength, perceptual threshold of touch, pain, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS); all recorded at baseline, postintervention and at 6 months poststroke.RESULTS: There were no differences between the high-dose and the low-dose groups for any outcome measures at any time points. Improvements ⩾ minimal clinically important difference were observed for FMA, hand grip strength, and mRS in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Providing the present ESS protocol prior to arm training was equally beneficial as arm training alone. These results are valid for patients with mild-to-moderate stroke and moderate arm impairments. We cannot exclude benefits in patients with other characteristics, in other time intervals poststroke or using a different ESS protocol.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02250365).",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arm/physiopathology, Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods, Female, Hand Strength/physiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paresis/etiology, Recovery of Function/physiology, Stroke/complications, Stroke Rehabilitation/methods, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Emma Ghaziani and Christian Coupp{\'e} and Volkert Siersma and Mette S{\o}ndergaard and Hanne Christensen and Magnusson, {S Peter}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/1545968318799496",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "899--912",
journal = "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation in Early Rehabilitation of Arm Paresis After Stroke

T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Ghaziani, Emma

AU - Couppé, Christian

AU - Siersma, Volkert

AU - Søndergaard, Mette

AU - Christensen, Hanne

AU - Magnusson, S Peter

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - BACKGROUND: Arm paresis is present in 48% to 77% of acute stroke patients. Complete functional recovery is reported in only 12% to 34%. Although the arm recovery is most pronounced during the first 4 weeks poststroke, few studies examined the effect of upper extremity interventions during this period.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of electrical somatosensory stimulation (ESS) delivered during early stroke rehabilitation on the recovery of arm functioning.METHODS: A total of 102 patients with arm paresis were randomized to a high-dose or a low-dose ESS group within 7 days poststroke according to our sample size estimation. The high-dose group received 1-hour ESS to the paretic arm daily during hospitalization immediately followed by minimum 15-minute task-oriented arm training that was considered a component of the usual rehabilitation. The low-dose group received a placebo ESS followed by identical training. Primary outcome-Box and Block Test (BBT); secondary outcomes-Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), grip strength, pinch strength, perceptual threshold of touch, pain, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS); all recorded at baseline, postintervention and at 6 months poststroke.RESULTS: There were no differences between the high-dose and the low-dose groups for any outcome measures at any time points. Improvements ⩾ minimal clinically important difference were observed for FMA, hand grip strength, and mRS in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Providing the present ESS protocol prior to arm training was equally beneficial as arm training alone. These results are valid for patients with mild-to-moderate stroke and moderate arm impairments. We cannot exclude benefits in patients with other characteristics, in other time intervals poststroke or using a different ESS protocol.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02250365).

AB - BACKGROUND: Arm paresis is present in 48% to 77% of acute stroke patients. Complete functional recovery is reported in only 12% to 34%. Although the arm recovery is most pronounced during the first 4 weeks poststroke, few studies examined the effect of upper extremity interventions during this period.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of electrical somatosensory stimulation (ESS) delivered during early stroke rehabilitation on the recovery of arm functioning.METHODS: A total of 102 patients with arm paresis were randomized to a high-dose or a low-dose ESS group within 7 days poststroke according to our sample size estimation. The high-dose group received 1-hour ESS to the paretic arm daily during hospitalization immediately followed by minimum 15-minute task-oriented arm training that was considered a component of the usual rehabilitation. The low-dose group received a placebo ESS followed by identical training. Primary outcome-Box and Block Test (BBT); secondary outcomes-Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), grip strength, pinch strength, perceptual threshold of touch, pain, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS); all recorded at baseline, postintervention and at 6 months poststroke.RESULTS: There were no differences between the high-dose and the low-dose groups for any outcome measures at any time points. Improvements ⩾ minimal clinically important difference were observed for FMA, hand grip strength, and mRS in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Providing the present ESS protocol prior to arm training was equally beneficial as arm training alone. These results are valid for patients with mild-to-moderate stroke and moderate arm impairments. We cannot exclude benefits in patients with other characteristics, in other time intervals poststroke or using a different ESS protocol.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02250365).

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Arm/physiopathology

KW - Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods

KW - Female

KW - Hand Strength/physiology

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Paresis/etiology

KW - Recovery of Function/physiology

KW - Stroke/complications

KW - Stroke Rehabilitation/methods

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1177/1545968318799496

DO - 10.1177/1545968318799496

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30251591

VL - 32

SP - 899

EP - 912

JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 216512888