Ecological strategies of (pl)ants: Towards a world-wide worker economic spectrum for ants

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,1 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Heloise Gibb
  • Tom R. Bishop
  • Lily Leahy
  • Catherine L Parr
  • Jean-Philippe Lessard
  • Nathan J. Sanders
  • Shik, Jonathan Z.
  • Javier Ibarra-Isassi
  • Ajay Narendra
  • Robert R. Dunn
  • Ian J. Wright

Current global challenges call for a rigorously predictive ecology. Our understanding of ecological strategies, imputed through suites of measurable functional traits, comes from decades of work that largely focussed on plants. However, a key question is whether plant ecological strategies resemble those of other organisms. Among animals, ants have long been recognised to possess similarities with plants: as (largely) central place foragers. For example, individual ant workers play similar foraging roles to plant leaves and roots and are similarly expendable. Frameworks that aim to understand plant ecological strategies through key functional traits, such as the ‘leaf economics spectrum’, offer the potential for significant parallels with ant ecological strategies. Here, we explore these parallels across several proposed ecological strategy dimensions, including an ‘economic spectrum’, propagule size-number trade-offs, apparency-defence trade-offs, resource acquisition trade-offs and stress-tolerance trade-offs. We also highlight where ecological strategies may differ between plants and ants. Furthermore, we consider how these strategies play out among the different modules of eusocial organisms, where selective forces act on the worker and reproductive castes, as well as the colony. Finally, we suggest future directions for ecological strategy research, including highlighting the availability of data and traits that may be more difficult to measure, but should receive more attention in future to better understand the ecological strategies of ants. The unique biology of eusocial organisms provides an unrivalled opportunity to bridge the gap in our understanding of ecological strategies in plants and animals and we hope that this perspective will ignite further interest. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftFunctional Ecology
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer1
Antal sider13
ISSN0269-8463
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
H.G. and I.J.W. were funded by the Australian Research Council (DP210101630), J.Z.S. was funded by a European Research Council Starting Grant (ELEVATE: ERC‐2017‐STG‐757810); T.R.B. was funded by the Leverhulme Trust (ECF‐2017‐208); JPL was supported by a NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN‐2015‐06081) and the Concordia University Research Chair in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function; J.I.‐I. was funded by NSERC‐CREATE in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Sustainability (BESS). Open access publishing facilitated by La Trobe University, as part of the Wiley ‐ La Trobe University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

ID: 316059119