Do Scandinavians Care About International Law?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Standard

Do Scandinavians Care About International Law? / Wind, Marlene.

I: Nordic Journal of International Law, 02.09.2016, s. 281-302.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Harvard

Wind, M 2016, 'Do Scandinavians Care About International Law?', Nordic Journal of International Law, s. 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08504010

APA

Wind, M. (2016). Do Scandinavians Care About International Law? Nordic Journal of International Law, 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08504010

Vancouver

Wind M. Do Scandinavians Care About International Law? Nordic Journal of International Law. 2016 sep. 2;281-302. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08504010

Author

Wind, Marlene. / Do Scandinavians Care About International Law?. I: Nordic Journal of International Law. 2016 ; s. 281-302.

Bibtex

@article{95566f2d51c54ab1bf203fe914b45a0c,
title = "Do Scandinavians Care About International Law?",
abstract = "Although Scandinavians are often celebrated as the vanguards of human rights and international law, we know little about whether courts and judges in these countries have embraced those international courts and conventions that they themselves helped establish after the Second World War. This article presents original and comprehensive data on three Scandinavian courts{\textquoteright} citation practice. It demonstrates that not only do Scandinavian Supreme Courts engage surprisingly little with international law, but also that there is great variation in the degree to which they have domesticated international law and courts by citing their case law. Building on this author{\textquoteright}s previous research, it is argued that Norway sticks out as much more engaged internationally due to a solid judicial review tradition at the national level. It is also argued that Scandinavian legal positivism, has influenced a much more reticent approach to international case law than would normally be expected from this region in the world.",
keywords = "Supreme Courts, citations analysis, Scandinavian judges, majoritarian democracy, judicial review, legal positivism, international law, international courts, Supreme courts, citations analysis, Scandinavian judges, majoritarian democracy, judicial review, legal positivism, international law, international courts",
author = "Marlene Wind",
note = "iCourts Working Papers Series No. 74. ",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1163/15718107-08504010",
language = "Dansk",
pages = "281--302",
journal = "Nordic Journal of International Law",
issn = "0902-7351",
publisher = "Brill - Nijhoff",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Scandinavians Care About International Law?

AU - Wind, Marlene

N1 - iCourts Working Papers Series No. 74.

PY - 2016/9/2

Y1 - 2016/9/2

N2 - Although Scandinavians are often celebrated as the vanguards of human rights and international law, we know little about whether courts and judges in these countries have embraced those international courts and conventions that they themselves helped establish after the Second World War. This article presents original and comprehensive data on three Scandinavian courts’ citation practice. It demonstrates that not only do Scandinavian Supreme Courts engage surprisingly little with international law, but also that there is great variation in the degree to which they have domesticated international law and courts by citing their case law. Building on this author’s previous research, it is argued that Norway sticks out as much more engaged internationally due to a solid judicial review tradition at the national level. It is also argued that Scandinavian legal positivism, has influenced a much more reticent approach to international case law than would normally be expected from this region in the world.

AB - Although Scandinavians are often celebrated as the vanguards of human rights and international law, we know little about whether courts and judges in these countries have embraced those international courts and conventions that they themselves helped establish after the Second World War. This article presents original and comprehensive data on three Scandinavian courts’ citation practice. It demonstrates that not only do Scandinavian Supreme Courts engage surprisingly little with international law, but also that there is great variation in the degree to which they have domesticated international law and courts by citing their case law. Building on this author’s previous research, it is argued that Norway sticks out as much more engaged internationally due to a solid judicial review tradition at the national level. It is also argued that Scandinavian legal positivism, has influenced a much more reticent approach to international case law than would normally be expected from this region in the world.

KW - Supreme Courts

KW - citations analysis

KW - Scandinavian judges

KW - majoritarian democracy

KW - judicial review

KW - legal positivism

KW - international law

KW - international courts

KW - Supreme courts

KW - citations analysis

KW - Scandinavian judges

KW - majoritarian democracy

KW - judicial review

KW - legal positivism

KW - international law

KW - international courts

U2 - 10.1163/15718107-08504010

DO - 10.1163/15718107-08504010

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SP - 281

EP - 302

JO - Nordic Journal of International Law

JF - Nordic Journal of International Law

SN - 0902-7351

ER -

ID: 203322940