TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating soil carbon science to farmers

T2 - incorporating credibility, salience and legitimacy

AU - Ingram, Julie

AU - Mills, Jane

AU - Dibari, Camilla

AU - Ferrise, Roberto

AU - Ghaley, Bhim Bahadur

AU - Hansen, Jens Grønbech

AU - Iglesias, Ana

AU - Karaczun, Zbigniew

AU - McVittie, Alistair

AU - Merante, Paolo

AU - Molnar, Andras

AU - Sánchez, Berta

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Abstract A key narrative within climate change science is that conserving and improving soil carbon through agricultural practices can contribute to agricultural productivity and is a promising option for mitigating carbon loss through sequestration. This paper examines the potential disconnect between science and practice in the context of communicating information about soil carbon management. It focuses on the information producing process and on stakeholder (adviser, farmer representative, policy maker etc) assessment of the attributes credibility, salience and legitimacy. In doing this it draws on results from consultations with stakeholders in the SmartSOIL project which aimed to provide decision support guidelines about practices that optimise carbon mitigation and crop productivity. An iterative methodology, used to engage stakeholders in developing, testing and validating a range of decision support guidelines in six case study regions across Europe, is described. This process enhanced legitimacy and revealed the importance, and the different dimensions, of stakeholder views on credibility and salience. The results also highlight the complexities and contested nature of managing soil carbon. Some insights are gained into how to achieve more effective communication about soil carbon management, including the need to provide opportunities in projects and research programmes for dialogue to engender better understanding between science and practice.

AB - Abstract A key narrative within climate change science is that conserving and improving soil carbon through agricultural practices can contribute to agricultural productivity and is a promising option for mitigating carbon loss through sequestration. This paper examines the potential disconnect between science and practice in the context of communicating information about soil carbon management. It focuses on the information producing process and on stakeholder (adviser, farmer representative, policy maker etc) assessment of the attributes credibility, salience and legitimacy. In doing this it draws on results from consultations with stakeholders in the SmartSOIL project which aimed to provide decision support guidelines about practices that optimise carbon mitigation and crop productivity. An iterative methodology, used to engage stakeholders in developing, testing and validating a range of decision support guidelines in six case study regions across Europe, is described. This process enhanced legitimacy and revealed the importance, and the different dimensions, of stakeholder views on credibility and salience. The results also highlight the complexities and contested nature of managing soil carbon. Some insights are gained into how to achieve more effective communication about soil carbon management, including the need to provide opportunities in projects and research programmes for dialogue to engender better understanding between science and practice.

KW - Soil carbon

KW - Farmers

KW - Advisers

KW - Credibility

KW - Salience

KW - Legitimacy

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 115

EP - 128

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -