Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law. / van der Donk, Berdien B E.

I: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Bind 17, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 303-307.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

van der Donk, BBE 2022, 'Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law', Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, bind 17, nr. 3, s. 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac012

APA

van der Donk, B. B. E. (2022). Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(3), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac012

Vancouver

van der Donk BBE. Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2022;17(3):303-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac012

Author

van der Donk, Berdien B E. / Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law. I: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2022 ; Bind 17, Nr. 3. s. 303-307.

Bibtex

@article{7bf3f1ceac9347918e692fffcf3cc3c6,
title = "Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law",
abstract = "This article provides an update on article 7 (1)(f) EUTMR, which covers the absolute ground of refusal for European trademarks contrary to public policy or principles of morality. The application of article 7 (1)(f) is strongly influenced by societal changes and therefore always subject to interpretational developments. In this article, the scope of article 7 (1)(f) is assessed in light of two recent developments: the emergence of the covid-19 pandemic, and the rise of cannabis use for therapeutic purposes. Both developments have sparked an increase in trademark applications and refusals. Firstly, a short overview of the application of article 7 (1)(f) is provided, followed by a thorough discussion of the European trademark refusals of the past two years (2019-2021) related to either cannabis or corona. It will show an inconsistency in the refusal of trademark on grounds of public policy and morality, mainly in relation to cannabis. It furthermore demonstrates the importance of the (social) context when assessing a potential moral controversy in a trademark, especially when the refusal is due to {\textquoteleft}suspected{\textquoteright} terminology, such as cannabis or corona.",
author = "{van der Donk}, {Berdien B E}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1093/jiplp/jpac012",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "303--307",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice",
issn = "1747-1532",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cannabis, corona, and the latest morality developments in European trademark law

AU - van der Donk, Berdien B E

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - This article provides an update on article 7 (1)(f) EUTMR, which covers the absolute ground of refusal for European trademarks contrary to public policy or principles of morality. The application of article 7 (1)(f) is strongly influenced by societal changes and therefore always subject to interpretational developments. In this article, the scope of article 7 (1)(f) is assessed in light of two recent developments: the emergence of the covid-19 pandemic, and the rise of cannabis use for therapeutic purposes. Both developments have sparked an increase in trademark applications and refusals. Firstly, a short overview of the application of article 7 (1)(f) is provided, followed by a thorough discussion of the European trademark refusals of the past two years (2019-2021) related to either cannabis or corona. It will show an inconsistency in the refusal of trademark on grounds of public policy and morality, mainly in relation to cannabis. It furthermore demonstrates the importance of the (social) context when assessing a potential moral controversy in a trademark, especially when the refusal is due to ‘suspected’ terminology, such as cannabis or corona.

AB - This article provides an update on article 7 (1)(f) EUTMR, which covers the absolute ground of refusal for European trademarks contrary to public policy or principles of morality. The application of article 7 (1)(f) is strongly influenced by societal changes and therefore always subject to interpretational developments. In this article, the scope of article 7 (1)(f) is assessed in light of two recent developments: the emergence of the covid-19 pandemic, and the rise of cannabis use for therapeutic purposes. Both developments have sparked an increase in trademark applications and refusals. Firstly, a short overview of the application of article 7 (1)(f) is provided, followed by a thorough discussion of the European trademark refusals of the past two years (2019-2021) related to either cannabis or corona. It will show an inconsistency in the refusal of trademark on grounds of public policy and morality, mainly in relation to cannabis. It furthermore demonstrates the importance of the (social) context when assessing a potential moral controversy in a trademark, especially when the refusal is due to ‘suspected’ terminology, such as cannabis or corona.

U2 - 10.1093/jiplp/jpac012

DO - 10.1093/jiplp/jpac012

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 303

EP - 307

JO - Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

JF - Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice

SN - 1747-1532

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 284421283