Beyond not bad or just okay: Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Beyond not bad or just okay : Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study). / Richards, J. S.; Hartman, C. A.; Jeronimus, B. F.; Ormel, J.; Reijneveld, S. A.; Veenstra, R.; Verhulst, F. C.; Vollebergh, W. A.M.; Oldehinkel, A. J.

I: Psychological Medicine, Bind 49, Nr. 9, 2019, s. 1459-1469.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Richards, JS, Hartman, CA, Jeronimus, BF, Ormel, J, Reijneveld, SA, Veenstra, R, Verhulst, FC, Vollebergh, WAM & Oldehinkel, AJ 2019, 'Beyond not bad or just okay: Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study)', Psychological Medicine, bind 49, nr. 9, s. 1459-1469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001976

APA

Richards, J. S., Hartman, C. A., Jeronimus, B. F., Ormel, J., Reijneveld, S. A., Veenstra, R., Verhulst, F. C., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2019). Beyond not bad or just okay: Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study). Psychological Medicine, 49(9), 1459-1469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001976

Vancouver

Richards JS, Hartman CA, Jeronimus BF, Ormel J, Reijneveld SA, Veenstra R o.a. Beyond not bad or just okay: Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study). Psychological Medicine. 2019;49(9):1459-1469. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718001976

Author

Richards, J. S. ; Hartman, C. A. ; Jeronimus, B. F. ; Ormel, J. ; Reijneveld, S. A. ; Veenstra, R. ; Verhulst, F. C. ; Vollebergh, W. A.M. ; Oldehinkel, A. J. / Beyond not bad or just okay : Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study). I: Psychological Medicine. 2019 ; Bind 49, Nr. 9. s. 1459-1469.

Bibtex

@article{5a9eb9a58890469d9d311601eea9d7ec,
title = "Beyond not bad or just okay: Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study)",
abstract = "BackgroundVarious childhood social experiences have been reported to predict adult outcomes. However, it is unclear how different social contexts may influence each other's effects in the long run. This study examined the joint contribution of adolescent family and peer experiences to young adult wellbeing and functioning.MethodsParticipants came from the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) study (n = 2230). We measured family and peer relations at ages 11 and 16 (i.e. family functioning, perceived parenting, peer status, peer relationship quality), and functioning as the combination of subjective wellbeing, physical and mental health, and socio-academic functioning at age 22. Using structural equation modelling, overall functioning was indicated by two latent variables for positive and negative functioning. Positive, negative and overall functioning at young adulthood were regressed on adolescent family experiences, peer experiences and interactions between the two.ResultsFamily experiences during early and mid-adolescence were most predictive for later functioning; peer experiences did not independently predict functioning. Interactions between family and peer experiences showed that both protective and risk factors can have context-dependent effects, being exacerbated or overshadowed by negative experiences or buffered by positive experiences in other contexts. Overall the effect sizes were modest at best.ConclusionsAdolescent family relations as well as the interplay with peer experiences predict young adult functioning. This emphasizes the importance of considering the relative effects of one context in relation to the other.",
keywords = "Adolescence, family relations, multidimensional functioning, peer relations, young adulthood",
author = "Richards, {J. S.} and Hartman, {C. A.} and Jeronimus, {B. F.} and J. Ormel and Reijneveld, {S. A.} and R. Veenstra and Verhulst, {F. C.} and Vollebergh, {W. A.M.} and Oldehinkel, {A. J.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1017/S0033291718001976",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1459--1469",
journal = "Psychological Medicine",
issn = "0033-2917",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond not bad or just okay

T2 - Social predictors of young adults' wellbeing and functioning (a TRAILS study)

AU - Richards, J. S.

AU - Hartman, C. A.

AU - Jeronimus, B. F.

AU - Ormel, J.

AU - Reijneveld, S. A.

AU - Veenstra, R.

AU - Verhulst, F. C.

AU - Vollebergh, W. A.M.

AU - Oldehinkel, A. J.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BackgroundVarious childhood social experiences have been reported to predict adult outcomes. However, it is unclear how different social contexts may influence each other's effects in the long run. This study examined the joint contribution of adolescent family and peer experiences to young adult wellbeing and functioning.MethodsParticipants came from the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) study (n = 2230). We measured family and peer relations at ages 11 and 16 (i.e. family functioning, perceived parenting, peer status, peer relationship quality), and functioning as the combination of subjective wellbeing, physical and mental health, and socio-academic functioning at age 22. Using structural equation modelling, overall functioning was indicated by two latent variables for positive and negative functioning. Positive, negative and overall functioning at young adulthood were regressed on adolescent family experiences, peer experiences and interactions between the two.ResultsFamily experiences during early and mid-adolescence were most predictive for later functioning; peer experiences did not independently predict functioning. Interactions between family and peer experiences showed that both protective and risk factors can have context-dependent effects, being exacerbated or overshadowed by negative experiences or buffered by positive experiences in other contexts. Overall the effect sizes were modest at best.ConclusionsAdolescent family relations as well as the interplay with peer experiences predict young adult functioning. This emphasizes the importance of considering the relative effects of one context in relation to the other.

AB - BackgroundVarious childhood social experiences have been reported to predict adult outcomes. However, it is unclear how different social contexts may influence each other's effects in the long run. This study examined the joint contribution of adolescent family and peer experiences to young adult wellbeing and functioning.MethodsParticipants came from the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) study (n = 2230). We measured family and peer relations at ages 11 and 16 (i.e. family functioning, perceived parenting, peer status, peer relationship quality), and functioning as the combination of subjective wellbeing, physical and mental health, and socio-academic functioning at age 22. Using structural equation modelling, overall functioning was indicated by two latent variables for positive and negative functioning. Positive, negative and overall functioning at young adulthood were regressed on adolescent family experiences, peer experiences and interactions between the two.ResultsFamily experiences during early and mid-adolescence were most predictive for later functioning; peer experiences did not independently predict functioning. Interactions between family and peer experiences showed that both protective and risk factors can have context-dependent effects, being exacerbated or overshadowed by negative experiences or buffered by positive experiences in other contexts. Overall the effect sizes were modest at best.ConclusionsAdolescent family relations as well as the interplay with peer experiences predict young adult functioning. This emphasizes the importance of considering the relative effects of one context in relation to the other.

KW - Adolescence

KW - family relations

KW - multidimensional functioning

KW - peer relations

KW - young adulthood

U2 - 10.1017/S0033291718001976

DO - 10.1017/S0033291718001976

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30229710

AN - SCOPUS:85053725740

VL - 49

SP - 1459

EP - 1469

JO - Psychological Medicine

JF - Psychological Medicine

SN - 0033-2917

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 215186753