Benchmarking HIV health care: from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Benchmarking HIV health care : from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study. / Podlekareva, Daria; Reekie, Joanne; Mocroft, Amanda; Losso, Marcelo; Rakhmanova, Aza G; Bakowska, Elzbieta; Karpov, Igor A; Lazarus, Jeff; Gatell, Jose; Lundgren, Jens; Kirk, Ole.

I: B M C Infectious Diseases, Bind 12, 09.2012, s. 229.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Podlekareva, D, Reekie, J, Mocroft, A, Losso, M, Rakhmanova, AG, Bakowska, E, Karpov, IA, Lazarus, J, Gatell, J, Lundgren, J & Kirk, O 2012, 'Benchmarking HIV health care: from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study', B M C Infectious Diseases, bind 12, s. 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-229

APA

Podlekareva, D., Reekie, J., Mocroft, A., Losso, M., Rakhmanova, A. G., Bakowska, E., Karpov, I. A., Lazarus, J., Gatell, J., Lundgren, J., & Kirk, O. (2012). Benchmarking HIV health care: from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study. B M C Infectious Diseases, 12, 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-229

Vancouver

Podlekareva D, Reekie J, Mocroft A, Losso M, Rakhmanova AG, Bakowska E o.a. Benchmarking HIV health care: from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study. B M C Infectious Diseases. 2012 sep.;12:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-229

Author

Podlekareva, Daria ; Reekie, Joanne ; Mocroft, Amanda ; Losso, Marcelo ; Rakhmanova, Aza G ; Bakowska, Elzbieta ; Karpov, Igor A ; Lazarus, Jeff ; Gatell, Jose ; Lundgren, Jens ; Kirk, Ole. / Benchmarking HIV health care : from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study. I: B M C Infectious Diseases. 2012 ; Bind 12. s. 229.

Bibtex

@article{685631c8d0824337bbf84ed9a398289a,
title = "Benchmarking HIV health care: from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study",
abstract = "ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art care involving the utilisation of multiple health care interventions is the basis for an optimal long-term clinical prognosis for HIV-patients. We evaluated health care for HIV-patients based on four key indicators. METHODS: Four indicators of health care were assessed: Compliance with current guidelines on initiation of 1) combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), 2) chemoprophylaxis, 3) frequency of laboratory monitoring, and 4) virological response to cART (proportion of patients with HIV-RNA <500copies/ml for >90% of time on cART). RESULTS: 7097 EuroSIDA patients were included from North (n = 923), South (n = 1059), West-Central (n = 1290) East-Central (n = 1366), East (n = 1964) Europe, and Argentina (n = 495). Patients in East Europe with CD4 <200cells/muL were less likely to initiate cART and Pneumocystis jiroveci-chemoprophylaxis compared to patients from all other regions, and less frequently had a laboratory assessment of their disease status. The proportion of patients with virological response was highest in North, 89% vs. 84%, 78%, 78%, 61%, 55% in West-Central, South, East-Central, Argentina and East, respectively, p <0.0001. Compared to North, patients from other regions had significantly lower odds of virological response; the difference was most pronounced for East and Argentina (adjusted OR 0.16[95%CI 0.11-0.23, p <0.0001]; 0.20[0.14-0.28, p <0.0001] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed assessment of HIV health care utilization document pronounced regional differences in adherence to guidelines and can help to identify gaps and direct target interventions. It may serve as a tool for assessment and benchmarking the clinical management of HIV-patients in any setting worldwide.",
author = "Daria Podlekareva and Joanne Reekie and Amanda Mocroft and Marcelo Losso and Rakhmanova, {Aza G} and Elzbieta Bakowska and Karpov, {Igor A} and Jeff Lazarus and Jose Gatell and Jens Lundgren and Ole Kirk",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1186/1471-2334-12-229",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "229",
journal = "B M C Infectious Diseases",
issn = "1471-2334",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmarking HIV health care

T2 - from individual patient care to health care evaluation. An example from the EuroSIDA study

AU - Podlekareva, Daria

AU - Reekie, Joanne

AU - Mocroft, Amanda

AU - Losso, Marcelo

AU - Rakhmanova, Aza G

AU - Bakowska, Elzbieta

AU - Karpov, Igor A

AU - Lazarus, Jeff

AU - Gatell, Jose

AU - Lundgren, Jens

AU - Kirk, Ole

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art care involving the utilisation of multiple health care interventions is the basis for an optimal long-term clinical prognosis for HIV-patients. We evaluated health care for HIV-patients based on four key indicators. METHODS: Four indicators of health care were assessed: Compliance with current guidelines on initiation of 1) combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), 2) chemoprophylaxis, 3) frequency of laboratory monitoring, and 4) virological response to cART (proportion of patients with HIV-RNA <500copies/ml for >90% of time on cART). RESULTS: 7097 EuroSIDA patients were included from North (n = 923), South (n = 1059), West-Central (n = 1290) East-Central (n = 1366), East (n = 1964) Europe, and Argentina (n = 495). Patients in East Europe with CD4 <200cells/muL were less likely to initiate cART and Pneumocystis jiroveci-chemoprophylaxis compared to patients from all other regions, and less frequently had a laboratory assessment of their disease status. The proportion of patients with virological response was highest in North, 89% vs. 84%, 78%, 78%, 61%, 55% in West-Central, South, East-Central, Argentina and East, respectively, p <0.0001. Compared to North, patients from other regions had significantly lower odds of virological response; the difference was most pronounced for East and Argentina (adjusted OR 0.16[95%CI 0.11-0.23, p <0.0001]; 0.20[0.14-0.28, p <0.0001] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed assessment of HIV health care utilization document pronounced regional differences in adherence to guidelines and can help to identify gaps and direct target interventions. It may serve as a tool for assessment and benchmarking the clinical management of HIV-patients in any setting worldwide.

AB - ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art care involving the utilisation of multiple health care interventions is the basis for an optimal long-term clinical prognosis for HIV-patients. We evaluated health care for HIV-patients based on four key indicators. METHODS: Four indicators of health care were assessed: Compliance with current guidelines on initiation of 1) combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), 2) chemoprophylaxis, 3) frequency of laboratory monitoring, and 4) virological response to cART (proportion of patients with HIV-RNA <500copies/ml for >90% of time on cART). RESULTS: 7097 EuroSIDA patients were included from North (n = 923), South (n = 1059), West-Central (n = 1290) East-Central (n = 1366), East (n = 1964) Europe, and Argentina (n = 495). Patients in East Europe with CD4 <200cells/muL were less likely to initiate cART and Pneumocystis jiroveci-chemoprophylaxis compared to patients from all other regions, and less frequently had a laboratory assessment of their disease status. The proportion of patients with virological response was highest in North, 89% vs. 84%, 78%, 78%, 61%, 55% in West-Central, South, East-Central, Argentina and East, respectively, p <0.0001. Compared to North, patients from other regions had significantly lower odds of virological response; the difference was most pronounced for East and Argentina (adjusted OR 0.16[95%CI 0.11-0.23, p <0.0001]; 0.20[0.14-0.28, p <0.0001] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed assessment of HIV health care utilization document pronounced regional differences in adherence to guidelines and can help to identify gaps and direct target interventions. It may serve as a tool for assessment and benchmarking the clinical management of HIV-patients in any setting worldwide.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2334-12-229

DO - 10.1186/1471-2334-12-229

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23009317

VL - 12

SP - 229

JO - B M C Infectious Diseases

JF - B M C Infectious Diseases

SN - 1471-2334

ER -

ID: 48497916