Benchmarking farm animal welfare: ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Benchmarking farm animal welfare : ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison. / Sandøe, Peter; Hansen, Henning Otte; Kristensen, Helle Halkjær; Christensen, Tove; Houe, Hans; Forkman, Björn.

Sustainable governance and management of food systems: Ethical perspectives. red. / Eija Vinnari; Markus Vinnari. Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2019. s. 65-70.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sandøe, P, Hansen, HO, Kristensen, HH, Christensen, T, Houe, H & Forkman, B 2019, Benchmarking farm animal welfare: ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison. i E Vinnari & M Vinnari (red), Sustainable governance and management of food systems: Ethical perspectives. Wageningen Academic Publishers, s. 65-70, Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Tampere, Finland, 18/09/2019. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-892-6_8

APA

Sandøe, P., Hansen, H. O., Kristensen, H. H., Christensen, T., Houe, H., & Forkman, B. (2019). Benchmarking farm animal welfare: ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison. I E. Vinnari, & M. Vinnari (red.), Sustainable governance and management of food systems: Ethical perspectives (s. 65-70). Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-892-6_8

Vancouver

Sandøe P, Hansen HO, Kristensen HH, Christensen T, Houe H, Forkman B. Benchmarking farm animal welfare: ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison. I Vinnari E, Vinnari M, red., Sustainable governance and management of food systems: Ethical perspectives. Wageningen Academic Publishers. 2019. s. 65-70 https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-892-6_8

Author

Sandøe, Peter ; Hansen, Henning Otte ; Kristensen, Helle Halkjær ; Christensen, Tove ; Houe, Hans ; Forkman, Björn. / Benchmarking farm animal welfare : ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison. Sustainable governance and management of food systems: Ethical perspectives. red. / Eija Vinnari ; Markus Vinnari. Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2019. s. 65-70

Bibtex

@inproceedings{dfc411f08fed4b35a5bee3ab5817a895,
title = "Benchmarking farm animal welfare: ethical considerations when developing a tool for cross-country comparison",
abstract = "A tool enabling animal welfare to be benchmarked across countries would make it possible to monitor and compare the status of animal welfare at both disaggregated and aggregated levels. The results of the international benchmarking would be useful for a wide range of stakeholders taking a positive interest in farm animal welfare. We aim to build a model for pigs and chickens with the following elements: (1) for each type of animal production considered a number of parameters linked to housing and management are defined. The parameters relate to features of production that are modified in legislative and market­driven initiatives to improve welfare; (2) by means of assessments made either by consumers or by experts, each value of these parameters is assigned a weight; (3) in each country the welfare level (beyond the basic level defined by EU regulation) found in the production, or the consumption, of pork and chicken meat is calculated; (4) the total state of farm animal welfare across different forms of production (here only two forms) is calculated for each country. A number of ethical considerations must be addressed in the process of building the model. In the paper we explain how we deal with several considerations. First, we focus on how to measure what affects animal welfare – whether the focus should be on environmental or outcome-based measures. Second, weights will need to be assigned to the different parameters, raising the question whether this should be done by animal welfare experts or consumers. Third, it will be necessary to decide what to include for each country and specifically whether it should be the welfare of animals produced in a country, including exports, or the amount of animal products consumed in the country, including imports. Fourth, a decision will need to be made on how to add welfare across pigs and chickens and whether to count number of individuals, the volume of products or the value of products.",
author = "Peter Sand{\o}e and Hansen, {Henning Otte} and Kristensen, {Helle Halkj{\ae}r} and Tove Christensen and Hans Houe and Bj{\"o}rn Forkman",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3920/978-90-8686-892-6_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-8686-341-9",
pages = "65--70",
editor = "Eija Vinnari and Markus Vinnari",
booktitle = "Sustainable governance and management of food systems",
publisher = "Wageningen Academic Publishers",
address = "Netherlands",
note = "Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, EurSafe 2019 ; Conference date: 18-09-2019 Through 21-09-2019",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Benchmarking farm animal welfare

T2 - Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics

AU - Sandøe, Peter

AU - Hansen, Henning Otte

AU - Kristensen, Helle Halkjær

AU - Christensen, Tove

AU - Houe, Hans

AU - Forkman, Björn

N1 - Conference code: 15

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - A tool enabling animal welfare to be benchmarked across countries would make it possible to monitor and compare the status of animal welfare at both disaggregated and aggregated levels. The results of the international benchmarking would be useful for a wide range of stakeholders taking a positive interest in farm animal welfare. We aim to build a model for pigs and chickens with the following elements: (1) for each type of animal production considered a number of parameters linked to housing and management are defined. The parameters relate to features of production that are modified in legislative and market­driven initiatives to improve welfare; (2) by means of assessments made either by consumers or by experts, each value of these parameters is assigned a weight; (3) in each country the welfare level (beyond the basic level defined by EU regulation) found in the production, or the consumption, of pork and chicken meat is calculated; (4) the total state of farm animal welfare across different forms of production (here only two forms) is calculated for each country. A number of ethical considerations must be addressed in the process of building the model. In the paper we explain how we deal with several considerations. First, we focus on how to measure what affects animal welfare – whether the focus should be on environmental or outcome-based measures. Second, weights will need to be assigned to the different parameters, raising the question whether this should be done by animal welfare experts or consumers. Third, it will be necessary to decide what to include for each country and specifically whether it should be the welfare of animals produced in a country, including exports, or the amount of animal products consumed in the country, including imports. Fourth, a decision will need to be made on how to add welfare across pigs and chickens and whether to count number of individuals, the volume of products or the value of products.

AB - A tool enabling animal welfare to be benchmarked across countries would make it possible to monitor and compare the status of animal welfare at both disaggregated and aggregated levels. The results of the international benchmarking would be useful for a wide range of stakeholders taking a positive interest in farm animal welfare. We aim to build a model for pigs and chickens with the following elements: (1) for each type of animal production considered a number of parameters linked to housing and management are defined. The parameters relate to features of production that are modified in legislative and market­driven initiatives to improve welfare; (2) by means of assessments made either by consumers or by experts, each value of these parameters is assigned a weight; (3) in each country the welfare level (beyond the basic level defined by EU regulation) found in the production, or the consumption, of pork and chicken meat is calculated; (4) the total state of farm animal welfare across different forms of production (here only two forms) is calculated for each country. A number of ethical considerations must be addressed in the process of building the model. In the paper we explain how we deal with several considerations. First, we focus on how to measure what affects animal welfare – whether the focus should be on environmental or outcome-based measures. Second, weights will need to be assigned to the different parameters, raising the question whether this should be done by animal welfare experts or consumers. Third, it will be necessary to decide what to include for each country and specifically whether it should be the welfare of animals produced in a country, including exports, or the amount of animal products consumed in the country, including imports. Fourth, a decision will need to be made on how to add welfare across pigs and chickens and whether to count number of individuals, the volume of products or the value of products.

U2 - 10.3920/978-90-8686-892-6_8

DO - 10.3920/978-90-8686-892-6_8

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-90-8686-341-9

SP - 65

EP - 70

BT - Sustainable governance and management of food systems

A2 - Vinnari, Eija

A2 - Vinnari, Markus

PB - Wageningen Academic Publishers

Y2 - 18 September 2019 through 21 September 2019

ER -

ID: 227697740