Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan. / Sejrup, Jens.

I: Public Relations Inquiry, Bind 3, Nr. 1, 15.01.2014, s. 51-68.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Sejrup, J 2014, 'Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan', Public Relations Inquiry, bind 3, nr. 1, s. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X13519637

APA

Sejrup, J. (2014). Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X13519637

Vancouver

Sejrup J. Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan. Public Relations Inquiry. 2014 jan. 15;3(1):51-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X13519637

Author

Sejrup, Jens. / Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan. I: Public Relations Inquiry. 2014 ; Bind 3, Nr. 1. s. 51-68.

Bibtex

@article{30372c58ca7b48e39ed4709967d2b36f,
title = "Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan",
abstract = "This article is a qualitative analysis of mass-mediated projections of relationships between public relations practitioners in the shape of activist groups and organizations, and subaltern stakeholders for whom they act as public representatives. Drawing my empirical examples from Japan and Taiwan and analysing the public relations implications of two politically sensitive and controversial cases, I question the nature of representative relations as reflected in mainstream mass media coverage in these two societies. Doing so, I raise concerns about the critical scope of scholarly interest in activism and the representation of other voices in public relations studies and draw on theoretical insights from Spivak, Guha, and others in order to untangle some of the complexities inherent in the mobilization of subaltern groups, here victims of historical abuse and maltreatment. The existence of such complexities in public and legal activism, I argue, remains largely ignored in public relations studies, despite the emergence of a new critical or postmodern paradigm. ",
author = "Jens Sejrup",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1177/2046147X13519637",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "51--68",
journal = "Public Relations Inquiry",
issn = "2046-147X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Awakening the Sufferers: Reflections on Public Relations, Activism, and Subalternity in Postcolonial Controversies between Taiwan and Japan

AU - Sejrup, Jens

PY - 2014/1/15

Y1 - 2014/1/15

N2 - This article is a qualitative analysis of mass-mediated projections of relationships between public relations practitioners in the shape of activist groups and organizations, and subaltern stakeholders for whom they act as public representatives. Drawing my empirical examples from Japan and Taiwan and analysing the public relations implications of two politically sensitive and controversial cases, I question the nature of representative relations as reflected in mainstream mass media coverage in these two societies. Doing so, I raise concerns about the critical scope of scholarly interest in activism and the representation of other voices in public relations studies and draw on theoretical insights from Spivak, Guha, and others in order to untangle some of the complexities inherent in the mobilization of subaltern groups, here victims of historical abuse and maltreatment. The existence of such complexities in public and legal activism, I argue, remains largely ignored in public relations studies, despite the emergence of a new critical or postmodern paradigm.

AB - This article is a qualitative analysis of mass-mediated projections of relationships between public relations practitioners in the shape of activist groups and organizations, and subaltern stakeholders for whom they act as public representatives. Drawing my empirical examples from Japan and Taiwan and analysing the public relations implications of two politically sensitive and controversial cases, I question the nature of representative relations as reflected in mainstream mass media coverage in these two societies. Doing so, I raise concerns about the critical scope of scholarly interest in activism and the representation of other voices in public relations studies and draw on theoretical insights from Spivak, Guha, and others in order to untangle some of the complexities inherent in the mobilization of subaltern groups, here victims of historical abuse and maltreatment. The existence of such complexities in public and legal activism, I argue, remains largely ignored in public relations studies, despite the emergence of a new critical or postmodern paradigm.

U2 - 10.1177/2046147X13519637

DO - 10.1177/2046147X13519637

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 51

EP - 68

JO - Public Relations Inquiry

JF - Public Relations Inquiry

SN - 2046-147X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 154471165