Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory : Parietal interactions. / Gillebert, Celine; Dyrholm, Mads; Vangkilde, Signe Allerup; Kyllingsbæk, Søren; Peeters, Ronald; Vandenberghe, Rik.

I: NeuroImage, Bind 62, Nr. 3, 2012, s. 1551-1562.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gillebert, C, Dyrholm, M, Vangkilde, SA, Kyllingsbæk, S, Peeters, R & Vandenberghe, R 2012, 'Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions', NeuroImage, bind 62, nr. 3, s. 1551-1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038

APA

Gillebert, C., Dyrholm, M., Vangkilde, S. A., Kyllingsbæk, S., Peeters, R., & Vandenberghe, R. (2012). Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions. NeuroImage, 62(3), 1551-1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038

Vancouver

Gillebert C, Dyrholm M, Vangkilde SA, Kyllingsbæk S, Peeters R, Vandenberghe R. Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions. NeuroImage. 2012;62(3):1551-1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038

Author

Gillebert, Celine ; Dyrholm, Mads ; Vangkilde, Signe Allerup ; Kyllingsbæk, Søren ; Peeters, Ronald ; Vandenberghe, Rik. / Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory : Parietal interactions. I: NeuroImage. 2012 ; Bind 62, Nr. 3. s. 1551-1562.

Bibtex

@article{c6cf837332624e1e8d56546088dc6e87,
title = "Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions",
abstract = "The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) has been implicated in selective attention as well as visual short-term memory (VSTM). To contrast mechanisms of target selection, distracter filtering, and access to VSTM, we combined behavioral testing, computational modeling and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in a change detection task in which we manipulated both target and distracter set size. We directly compared the IPS response as a function of the number of targets and distracters in the display and in VSTM. When distracters were not present, the posterior and middle segments of IPS showed the predicted asymptotic activity increase with an increasing target set size. When distracters were added to a single target, activity also increased as predicted. However, the addition of distracters to multiple targets suppressed both middle and posterior IPS activity, thereby displaying a significant interaction between the two factors. The interaction between target and distracter set size in IPS could not be accounted for by a simple explanation in terms of number of items accessing VSTM. Instead, it led us to a model where items accessing VSTM receive differential weights depending on their behavioral relevance, and secondly, a suppressive effect originates during the selection phase when multiple targets and multiple distracters are simultaneously present. The reverse interaction between target and distracter set size was significant in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), where activity was highest for a single target compared to any other condition. Our study reconciles the role of middle IPS in attentional selection and biased competition with its role in VSTM access.",
author = "Celine Gillebert and Mads Dyrholm and Vangkilde, {Signe Allerup} and S{\o}ren Kyllingsb{\ae}k and Ronald Peeters and Rik Vandenberghe",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "1551--1562",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory

T2 - Parietal interactions

AU - Gillebert, Celine

AU - Dyrholm, Mads

AU - Vangkilde, Signe Allerup

AU - Kyllingsbæk, Søren

AU - Peeters, Ronald

AU - Vandenberghe, Rik

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) has been implicated in selective attention as well as visual short-term memory (VSTM). To contrast mechanisms of target selection, distracter filtering, and access to VSTM, we combined behavioral testing, computational modeling and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in a change detection task in which we manipulated both target and distracter set size. We directly compared the IPS response as a function of the number of targets and distracters in the display and in VSTM. When distracters were not present, the posterior and middle segments of IPS showed the predicted asymptotic activity increase with an increasing target set size. When distracters were added to a single target, activity also increased as predicted. However, the addition of distracters to multiple targets suppressed both middle and posterior IPS activity, thereby displaying a significant interaction between the two factors. The interaction between target and distracter set size in IPS could not be accounted for by a simple explanation in terms of number of items accessing VSTM. Instead, it led us to a model where items accessing VSTM receive differential weights depending on their behavioral relevance, and secondly, a suppressive effect originates during the selection phase when multiple targets and multiple distracters are simultaneously present. The reverse interaction between target and distracter set size was significant in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), where activity was highest for a single target compared to any other condition. Our study reconciles the role of middle IPS in attentional selection and biased competition with its role in VSTM access.

AB - The intraparietal sulcus (IPS) has been implicated in selective attention as well as visual short-term memory (VSTM). To contrast mechanisms of target selection, distracter filtering, and access to VSTM, we combined behavioral testing, computational modeling and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in a change detection task in which we manipulated both target and distracter set size. We directly compared the IPS response as a function of the number of targets and distracters in the display and in VSTM. When distracters were not present, the posterior and middle segments of IPS showed the predicted asymptotic activity increase with an increasing target set size. When distracters were added to a single target, activity also increased as predicted. However, the addition of distracters to multiple targets suppressed both middle and posterior IPS activity, thereby displaying a significant interaction between the two factors. The interaction between target and distracter set size in IPS could not be accounted for by a simple explanation in terms of number of items accessing VSTM. Instead, it led us to a model where items accessing VSTM receive differential weights depending on their behavioral relevance, and secondly, a suppressive effect originates during the selection phase when multiple targets and multiple distracters are simultaneously present. The reverse interaction between target and distracter set size was significant in the right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), where activity was highest for a single target compared to any other condition. Our study reconciles the role of middle IPS in attentional selection and biased competition with its role in VSTM access.

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.038

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22634216

VL - 62

SP - 1551

EP - 1562

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 40246405