Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire. / Lund, Rikke; Nielsen, Lene Snabe; Henriksen, Pia Wichmann; Schmidt, Lone; Avlund, Kirsten; Christensen, Ulla.
I: Journal of Aging and Health, Bind 26, Nr. 1, 02.2014, s. 128-50.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Content validity and reliability of the Copenhagen social relations questionnaire
AU - Lund, Rikke
AU - Nielsen, Lene Snabe
AU - Henriksen, Pia Wichmann
AU - Schmidt, Lone
AU - Avlund, Kirsten
AU - Christensen, Ulla
PY - 2014/2
Y1 - 2014/2
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article is to describe the face and content validity as well as reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire (CSRQ).METHOD: The face and content validity test was based on focus group discussions and individual interviews with 31 informants. Another 94 men and women participated in an 8-day test-retest analysis.RESULTS: Informants generally expressed that the questions and response categories were relevant and easy to understand. Themes on structure of social relations, social support, and negative aspects of social relations emerged clearly from the interviews. Two additional themes not covered by CSRQ on dynamics and reciprocity of social relations were identified.DISCUSSION: CSRQ holds satisfactory face and content validity as well as reliability, and is suitable for measuring structure and function of social relations including the negative aspects among middle-aged individuals.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article is to describe the face and content validity as well as reliability of the Copenhagen Social Relations Questionnaire (CSRQ).METHOD: The face and content validity test was based on focus group discussions and individual interviews with 31 informants. Another 94 men and women participated in an 8-day test-retest analysis.RESULTS: Informants generally expressed that the questions and response categories were relevant and easy to understand. Themes on structure of social relations, social support, and negative aspects of social relations emerged clearly from the interviews. Two additional themes not covered by CSRQ on dynamics and reciprocity of social relations were identified.DISCUSSION: CSRQ holds satisfactory face and content validity as well as reliability, and is suitable for measuring structure and function of social relations including the negative aspects among middle-aged individuals.
KW - Denmark
KW - Female
KW - Focus Groups
KW - Humans
KW - Interpersonal Relations
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Qualitative Research
KW - Questionnaires
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Social Support
U2 - 10.1177/0898264313510033
DO - 10.1177/0898264313510033
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 24584264
VL - 26
SP - 128
EP - 150
JO - Journal of Aging and Health
JF - Journal of Aging and Health
SN - 0898-2643
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 117200896