Mammals show distinct functional gut microbiome dynamics to identical series of environmental stressors

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,41 MB, PDF-dokument

The ability of the gut microbiome has been posited as an additional axis of animals’ phenotypic plasticity. However, whether and how such plasticity varies across hosts with different biological features remains unclear. We performed a captivity experiment to compare how the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional microbial dynamics varied across a series of temperature and dietary disturbances in two mammals: the insectivorous-specialist Crocidura russula and the omnivorous-generalist Apodemus sylvaticus. Combining genome-resolved metagenomics, metabolic pathway distillation and joint species distribution modeling, we observed that, although microbiome alpha diversity of both species remained stable, C. russula exhibited substantially higher variability and directionality of microbial responses than A. sylvaticus. Our results indicate that the intrinsic properties (e.g., diversity and functional redundancy) of microbial communities coupled with physiological attributes (e.g., thermal plasticity) of hosts shape the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional response of gut microbiomes to environmental stressors, which might influence their contribution to the acclimation and adaptation capacity of animal hosts. IMPORTANCE In our manuscript, we report the first interspecific comparative study about the plasticity of the gut microbiota. We conducted a captivity experiment that exposed wild-captured mammals to a series of environmental challenges over 45 days. We characterized their gut microbial communities using genome-resolved metagenomics and modeled how the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional microbial dynamics varied across a series of disturbances in both species. Our results indicate that the intrinsic properties (e.g., diversity and functional redundancy) of microbial communities coupled with physiological attributes (e.g., thermal plasticity) of hosts shape the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional response of gut microbiomes to environmental stressors, which might influence their contribution to the acclimation and adaptation capacity of animal hosts.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere01606-23
TidsskriftmBio
Vol/bind14
Udgave nummer5
Antal sider17
ISSN2161-2129
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 801199.

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Lundbeckfonden grant R250-2017-1351 awarded to A.A. and Danish National Research Foundation grant DNRF143.

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Lundbeckfonden grant R250-2017-1351 awarded to A.A. and Danish National Research Foundation grant DNRF143. The authors would also like to thank everyone at the Center of Evolutionary Hologenomics at the University of Copenhagen for their continued help and support, in particular, Tom Gilbert, Anders J Hansen, Lasse Nyholm, Mandy Boltnen, Nuno Martins, Linett Rasmussen, Marta Ciucani, Sofia Marcos, and Sarah Mak. The authors are also grateful to the people associated with the ZIBA Experimentation Center, in particular, the authors are deeply indebted to Martxel Aizpurua for his continuous support, and students Andoni Aguirrezabala and Lander Olasagasti for their help in the field work. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 801199. The authors would also like to thank the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (http://ian.umces.edu/symbols/) for the use of their vector images. This study was performed in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines; however,ue to variation in capture success of wild individuals we were unable to have even sample sizes across treatments and species. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in the preparation of this manuscript. Lundbeck Foundation (Lundbeckfonden) R250-2017-1351 Antton Alberdi Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF) DNRF143 Antton Alberdi

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Koziol et al.

ID: 374453711