Lower versus Higher Hemoglobin Threshold for Transfusion in Septic Shock

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Lars B Holst
  • Nicolai Haase
  • Jørn Wetterslev
  • Jan Wernerman
  • Anne B Guttormsen
  • Sari Karlsson
  • Pär I Johansson
  • Anders Aneman
  • Marianne L Vang
  • Robert Winding
  • Lars Nebrich
  • Helle L Nibro
  • Bodil S Rasmussen
  • Johnny R M Lauridsen
  • Jane S Nielsen
  • Anders Oldner
  • Ville Pettilä
  • Maria B Cronhjort
  • Lasse H Andersen
  • Ulf G Pedersen
  • Nanna Reiter
  • Jørgen Wiis
  • Jonathan O White
  • Lene Russell
  • Klaus J Thornberg
  • Peter B Hjortrup
  • Rasmus G Müller
  • Morten H Møller
  • Morten Steensen
  • Inga Tjäder
  • Kristina Kilsand
  • Suzanne Odeberg-Wernerman
  • Brit Sjøbø
  • Helle Bundgaard
  • Maria A Thyø
  • David Lodahl
  • Rikke Mærkedahl
  • Carsten Albeck
  • Dorte Illum
  • Mary Kruse
  • Per Winkel
  • Perner, Anders
  • TRISS Trial Group

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions are frequently given to patients with septic shock. However, the benefits and harms of different hemoglobin thresholds for transfusion have not been established.

METHODS: In this multicenter, parallel-group trial, we randomly assigned patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who had septic shock and a hemoglobin concentration of 9 g per deciliter or less to receive 1 unit of leukoreduced red cells when the hemoglobin level was 7 g per deciliter or less (lower threshold) or when the level was 9 g per deciliter or less (higher threshold) during the ICU stay. The primary outcome measure was death by 90 days after randomization.

RESULTS: We analyzed data from 998 of 1005 patients (99.3%) who underwent randomization. The two intervention groups had similar baseline characteristics. In the ICU, the lower-threshold group received a median of 1 unit of blood (interquartile range, 0 to 3) and the higher-threshold group received a median of 4 units (interquartile range, 2 to 7). At 90 days after randomization, 216 of 502 patients (43.0%) assigned to the lower-threshold group, as compared with 223 of 496 (45.0%) assigned to the higher-threshold group, had died (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.09; P=0.44). The results were similar in analyses adjusted for risk factors at baseline and in analyses of the per-protocol populations. The numbers of patients who had ischemic events, who had severe adverse reactions, and who required life support were similar in the two intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with septic shock, mortality at 90 days and rates of ischemic events and use of life support were similar among those assigned to blood transfusion at a higher hemoglobin threshold and those assigned to blood transfusion at a lower threshold; the latter group received fewer transfusions. (Funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council and others; TRISS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01485315.).

Original languageEnglish
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume371
Issue number15
Pages (from-to)1381-91
Number of pages11
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Research areas

  • Aged, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Female, Hemoglobins, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Ischemia, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Ischemia, Risk, Shock, Septic, Single-Blind Method

ID: 135275549