Find en forsker – Københavns Universitet

Videresend til en ven Resize Print Bookmark and Share

Find en forsker

Defining Rhetorical Argumentation

Publikation: Forskning - peer reviewTidsskriftartikel

Dokumenter

This article argues for a definition of rhetorical argumentation based on the theme of the argumentation, i.e., the issue in dispute - rather than its aim (e.g., to ‘win’) or its means (e.g., emotional appeals). The principal thinkers in the rhetorical tradition, from Aristotle onwards, saw rhetoric as practical reasoning, i.e., reasoning on proposals for action or choice, not on propositions that may be either true or false. Citing several contemporary philosophers, the article argues that such a definition acquits rhetorical argumentation of any culpable unconcern with truth and explains certain peculiar properties of it that tend to be under-theorized in argumentation theory.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPhilosophy and Rhetoric
Vol/bind46
Tidsskriftsnummer4
Sider (fra-til)437-464
Antal sider28
ISSN0031-8213
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 10 dec. 2013

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 45966749